Cited by 23Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesInformation and Cyber Security

Resilient cloud cluster with DevSecOps security model, automates a data analysis, vulnerability search and risk calculation

Open access
Alghawli, Abed Saif Ahmed, Radivilova, Tamara·2024·Alexandria Engineering Journal

Abstract

Automated, secure software development is an important digitalization task, solved with the DevSecOps approach. An important part of the DevSecOps approach is continuous risk assessment, which is necessary to identify and evaluate risk factors. Combining the development cycle with continuous risk assessment creates software development and operation synergies and minimizes vulnerabilities. The article presents the main methods of deploying web applications and ways to increase information security at all stages of product development. It also compares different types of infrastructures and cloud computing providers and analyzes modern tools used to automate processes. The cloud cluster was deployed using Terraform and the Jenkins pipeline, written in the Groovy programming language, which checks program code for vulnerabilities and allows you to fix violations at the earliest stages of developing secure web applications. The developed cluster implements the proposed algorithm for automated risk assessment based on the calculation (modeling) of cloud infrastructure threats and vulnerabilities, which operates in real-time, periodically collecting all information and adjusting the system according to the risk and applied controls. The algorithm for calculating risk and losses is based on statistical data and FAIR information risk assessment methodology. The risk value obtained using the proposed method is quantitative, which allows more efficient forecasting of information security costs in software development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aej.2024.07.036

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study applies the FAIR methodology to enable real-time, quantitative risk assessment in cloud environments.

    “The study compares different infrastructures and cloud service providers, and notably applies the FAIR (Factor Analysis of Information Risk) methodology to enable real-time, quantitative risk assessment in cloud environments.”

    From Evolution of DevSecOps and Its Influence on Application Security: A Systematic Literature Review (2025) · cites this paper as [43]

    Section 5.1 (pp. 9–10) compares cloud providers, and the Conclusion (p. 19) describes a real-time system that produces quantitative risk values. Section 4 (pp. 8–9) says the method follows a FAIR concept but moves from FAIR's qualitative assessment to a quantitative one. Thus, the paper does not attribute its real-time, quantitative assessment to applying FAIR itself. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Alghawli & Radivilova [43] explore methods for enhancing security throughout all stages of software development, with a particular emphasis on automation tools such as Terraform and Jenkins.

    “Alghawli & Radivilova [43] explore methods for enhancing security throughout all stages of software development, with a particular emphasis on automation tools such as Terraform and Jenkins.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [13]13. Lemeshko, O.; Yevdokymenko, M.; Yeremenko, O.; Kuzminykh, I. Cyber Resilience and Fault Tolerance of Artificial Intelligence Systems: EU Standards, Guidelines, and Reports. In proceedings of CPITS Kyiv, Ukraine, July 7, 2020, pp. 99-108.
  2. [32]32. Wilson, G. DevSecOps: A Leader's Guide to Producing Secure Software Without By. Compromising Flow, Feedback and Continuous Improvement . Rethink Press: Norfolk, GB , 2020, 280 p.
  3. [37]37. Evolving Software Processes. Trends and Future Directions. Khan, A.A; Dac-Nhuong, L. Eds. Wiley: UK, 2022, 320 p.
  4. [44]44. Wilson, G. DevSecOps. A Leader's Guide to Producing Secure Software Without Compromising Flow, Feedback and Continuous Improvement. Rethink Press: Norfolk, GB, 2020, 280 p.
  5. [52]52. Blokdyk, G. DevSecOps Strategy a Complete Guide - 2020 Edition . Emereo Pty Limited: Queensland, Australia, 2019. 306 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Alghawli, A. S. A., & Radivilova, T.
Affiliations
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University (SA)
Corresponding author
Alghawli, Abed Saif Ahmed
Venue
Alexandria Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
107
Pages
136-149
ISSN
1110-0168 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400673905
Cited by
23
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 1
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alexandria Engineering Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University Deanship of Scientific Research (IF2/PSAU/2022/01/22780)
  • Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
  • Deanship of Scientific Research, King Saud University
  • Ministry of Education - Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
Keywords
DevSecOps, cloud clusters, continuous risk assessment, vulnerability detection, automated risk assessment, Terraform, Jenkins Pipeline, cloud provider comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review