Cited by 7Food composition and propertiesSeed and Plant BiochemistryFood Quality and Safety Studies

The Effect of Different Formulations and Baking Conditions on the Physicochemical Properties of Gluten-Free Cakes

Open access
Allahyari, Narges, Gharekhani, Mehdi, Bodbodak, Samad, Asefi, Narmela, Khiabani, Arezou Habibzadeh·2025·Applied Food Research

Abstract

Response Surface Methodology (RSM) with Central Composite Design (CCD) was performed in this study to optimize the gluten-free cake formulation. The range of the independent variables, namely sprouted mung bean flour (5, 10, and 15% replacement of corn flour), Plantago mucilage (0.1, 0.5, and 0.9% replacement of egg), grape syrup (20, 40, and 60% replacement of glucose), and DATEM emulsifier (0.4, 0.8, and 1.2 %) were identified which affect the moisture, specific volume, firmness, porosity, and antioxidant activity of the gluten-free cake. Models were developed from the data to predict response variables from the factors evaluated. Models for all dependent variables were found to be significant. Significant models were then used to optimize selected response variables, highest moisture content, specific volume, and antioxidant activity with acceptable texture in the range of values measured in the control cake. Optimum conditions were 13.3% sprouted mung bean flour, 0.615% Plantago mucilage, 1.2% DATEM emulsifier, and 60% grape syrup. The optimized cake exhibited a moisture content of 31.2%, a specific volume of 1.87 cm³/g, a porosity of 19.2%, an antioxidant activity (DPPH) of 10.8%, and a hardness coefficient of 3.76 N. The influence of different baking methods on optimized formulation was evaluated. Cakes baked using a combination of microwave-infrared (MW30-IR70) heating showed significantly higher porosity (18.9%) and moisture content (∼31%) compared to cakes baked using only microwave (MW-40, MW-50) or infrared (IR) baking methods (p < 0.05). The samples with the highest antioxidant activity were those baked in a conventional oven (CO) (10.8%) and MW-40 (10.17%). Conversely, samples baked in a higher power microwave (MW-50) were found to have greater hardness (4.5 N) compared to those baked in a conventional oven (CO) (3.7 N). The sample with the highest overall acceptance score (4.20) from the evaluators' perspective was the one prepared using the conventional oven (CO) method, which did not have a statistically significant difference from the sample prepared using MW30-IR70 (p>0.05). However, the infrared oven improved gelatinization with a more desirable microstructure. Consequently, baking new gluten-free cake formulation in the microwave-infrared oven can be an innovative alternative.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.afres.2025.101301

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allahyari, N., Gharekhani, M., Bodbodak, S., Asefi, N., & Khiabani, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Islamic Azad University of Tabriz (IR)
  • University of Tabriz (IR)
Corresponding author
Gharekhani, Mehdi
Venue
Applied Food Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2025-12
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
101301
ISSN
2772-5022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413758566
Cited by
6
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6
FWCI
3.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Applied Food Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Seed and Plant Biochemistry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
Keywords
gluten-free cake, egg substitutes, moisture content, specific volume, porosity, hardness, antioxidant activity, texture, sensory acceptability, physicochemical properties, DPPH radical scavenging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review