The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2025) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 352,181
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Solutions for a cultivated planet
Foley, J. A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K. A., Cassidy, E. S., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Mueller, N. D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D. K., West, P. C., et al. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10452 · Cited by 8,476
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704 · cited 1×
“In meta-analysis, effect sizes are extracted from individual studies and pooled to calculate an overall effect size with associated statistical significance (Hedges et al., 1999).”
Methodde Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,464
Vilà, M., Espinar, J. L., Hejda, M., Hulme, P. E., Jarošík, V., Maron, J. L., Pergl, J., Schaffner, U., Sun, Y., & Pyšek, P. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01628.x · Cited by 3,068
Ellis, P. D. (2010) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511761676 · Cited by 2,461
Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis: Prevention, Assessment and Adjustments
(2005) · doi:10.1002/0470870168 · Cited by 2,368
Farming and the Fate of Wild Nature
Green, R. E., Cornell, S. J., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Balmford, A. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106049 · Cited by 2,238
Global food security, biodiversity conservation and the future of agricultural intensification
Tscharntke, T., Clough, Y., Wanger, T. C., Jackson, L., Motzke, I., Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., & Whitbread, A. (2012) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.068 · Cited by 2,066
Cited by
Do European agroforestry systems enhance biodiversity and ecosystem services? A meta-analysis
Torralba, M., Fagerholm, N., Burgess, P. J., Moreno, G., & Plieninger, T. (2016) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2016.06.002 · Cited by 689
Meli, P., Holl, K. D., Rey Benayas, J. M., Jones, H. P., Jones, P. C., Montoya, D., & Moreno Mateos, D. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171368 · Cited by 455
Self-citationA new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review
Therond, O., Duru, M., Roger-Estrade, J., & Richard, G. (2017) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7 · Cited by 293
Dendoncker, N., Boeraeve, F., Crouzat, E., Dufrêne, M., König, A., & Barnaud, C. (2018) · Ecology and Society · doi:10.5751/es-09843-230112 · Cited by 88
Contribution of agroecological farming systems to the delivery of ecosystem services
Boeraeve, F., Dendoncker, N., Cornélis, J.-T., Degrune, F., & Dufrêne, M. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109576 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Barral, M. P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Meli, P., & Maceira, N. O.
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-04
- Volume
- 202
- Pages
- 223-231
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2011925816
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 17.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
- The paper
- Barral, M. P., Rey Benayas, J. M., Meli, P., & Maceira, N. O. (2015). Quantifying the impacts of ecological restoration on biodiversity and ecosystem services in agroecosystems: A global meta-analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.01.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
