Cited by 109Agronomic Practices and Intercropping SystemsAgricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics

Biochar amendments increase the yield advantage of legume-based intercropping systems over monoculture

Liu, Ling, Wang, Yanfang, Yan, Xinwei, Li, Jiwei, Jiao, Nianyuan, Hu, Shuijin·2017·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment

Abstract

Biochar soil amendments are receiving increased attention as one strategy to improve soil quality and crop productivity. However, studies about how biochar affects crop productivity so far have mainly focused on single cropping systems. Few have examined the effects of biochar additions on intercrops. We conducted a field experiment that investigated the effects of biochar amendments on yield and nutrient uptake in an intercropping system where maize (Zea mays L.) was intercropped with either soybean (Glycine max L.) or peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The relative advantages of both yield and total nutrient content were calculated as land equivalent ratios (LER). Biochar amendments significantly increased the yield advantage in both maize/soybean and maize/peanut systems over the single crops. Similarly, they significantly enhanced the relative N and P uptake advantage. Using the 15N isotope dilution method, we examined the effect of biochar amendments on peanut N2-fixation and subsequent N transfer from peanut to maize in a root-box experiment. Biochar amendments of 10 and 20gkg−1 soil increased peanut N fixation by 15.52% and 14.11%, and increased N transfer from peanut to maize by 32.66% and 36.07%, respectively. These results indicate that amending soil with biochar can amplify the benefits of legume-based intercropping by enhancing legume N fixation and facilitating N transfer from legume plants to co-existing cereal crops.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.026

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Liu, L., Wang, Y., Yan, X., Li, J., Jiao, N., & Hu, S.
Affiliations
  • North Carolina State University (US)
  • Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Liu, Ling
  • Hu, Shuijin
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-01
Volume
237
Pages
16-23
ISSN
0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2564319987
Cited by
109
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
FWCI
11.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Nature Science Foundation of China (31200332, U1404315)
  • China Scholarship Council (201408410302)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Keywords
biochar, soil amendment, intercropping, maize, soybean, groundnut, land equivalent ratio, nitrogen uptake, phosphorus uptake, nitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, crop yield

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review