Biochar amendments increase the yield advantage of legume-based intercropping systems over monoculture
Abstract
Biochar soil amendments are receiving increased attention as one strategy to improve soil quality and crop productivity. However, studies about how biochar affects crop productivity so far have mainly focused on single cropping systems. Few have examined the effects of biochar additions on intercrops. We conducted a field experiment that investigated the effects of biochar amendments on yield and nutrient uptake in an intercropping system where maize (Zea mays L.) was intercropped with either soybean (Glycine max L.) or peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). The relative advantages of both yield and total nutrient content were calculated as land equivalent ratios (LER). Biochar amendments significantly increased the yield advantage in both maize/soybean and maize/peanut systems over the single crops. Similarly, they significantly enhanced the relative N and P uptake advantage. Using the 15N isotope dilution method, we examined the effect of biochar amendments on peanut N2-fixation and subsequent N transfer from peanut to maize in a root-box experiment. Biochar amendments of 10 and 20gkg−1 soil increased peanut N fixation by 15.52% and 14.11%, and increased N transfer from peanut to maize by 32.66% and 36.07%, respectively. These results indicate that amending soil with biochar can amplify the benefits of legume-based intercropping by enhancing legume N fixation and facilitating N transfer from legume plants to co-existing cereal crops.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Promotion of root colonization by mycorrhizal fungi results in improved plant growth, nutrient uptake, and yield.
“This results in improved plant growth, nutrient uptake and yield (Mickan et al., 2016;Liu et al., 2017).”
From Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides (2021) · cites this paper as Liu et al., 2017
Cites
Biochar effects on soil biota – A review
Lehmann, J., Rillig, M. C., Thies, J., Masiello, C. A., Hockaday, W. C., & Crowley, D. (2011) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.04.022 · Cited by 5,074 · see citing works
Sustainable biochar to mitigate global climate change
Woolf, D., Amonette, J. E., Street-Perrott, F. A., Lehmann, J., & Joseph, S. (2010) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms1053 · Cited by 2,680 · see citing works
Jeffery, S., Verheijen, F. G. A., van der Velde, M., & Bastos, A. C. (2011) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2011.08.015 · Cited by 2,422 · see citing works
A review of biochar and its use and function in soil
Sohi, S. P., Krull, E., Lopez-Capel, E., & Bol, R. (2010) · Advances in Agronomy · doi:10.1016/s0065-2113(10)05002-9 · Cited by 2,240 · see citing works
Atkinson, C. J., Fitzgerald, J. D., & Hipps, N. A. (2010) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0464-5 · Cited by 2,154 · see citing works
Biochar and its effects on plant productivity and nutrient cycling: A meta-analysis
Biederman, L. A., & Harpole, W. S. (2013) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12037 · Cited by 1,737 · see citing works
Mycorrhizal responses to biochar in soil–concepts and mechanisms
Warnock, D. D., Lehmann, J., Kuyper, T. W., & Rillig, M. C. (2007) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-007-9391-5 · Cited by 1,269 · see citing works
Güereña, D. T., Lehmann, J., Thies, J. E., Enders, A., Karanja, N., & Neufeldt, H. (2015) · Biology and Fertility of Soils · doi:10.1007/s00374-014-0990-z · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Huang, M., Yang, L., Qin, H., Jiang, L., & Zou, Y. (2013) · Field Crops Research · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2013.08.010 · Cited by 107 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Siedt, M., Schäffer, A., Smith, K. E. C., Nabel, M., Roß-Nickoll, M., & van Dongen, J. T. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607 · Cited by 543 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, L., Wang, Y., Yan, X., Li, J., Jiao, N., & Hu, S.
- Affiliations
- North Carolina State University (US)
- Henan University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Ling
- Hu, Shuijin
- Venue
- Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2017-01
- Volume
- 237
- Pages
- 16-23
- ISSN
- 0167-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2564319987
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 11.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Nature Science Foundation of China (31200332, U1404315)
- China Scholarship Council (201408410302)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agronomic Practices and Intercropping Systems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
- Keywords
- biochar, soil amendment, intercropping, maize, soybean, groundnut, land equivalent ratio, nitrogen uptake, phosphorus uptake, nitrogen fixation, nitrogen transfer, crop yield
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review