Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agroforestry systems can mitigate the impacts of climate change on coffee production: A spatially explicit assessment in Brazil

Gomes, L.C., Bianchi, F.J.J.A., Cardoso, I.M., Fernandes, R.B.A., Filho, E.I. Fernandes, Schulte, R.P.O.·2020·Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
DOI 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Akpo, 2005, Tree shade effects on soils and environmental factors in a savanna of Senegal, West African J. Appl. Ecol., 7
  2. Baca, 2014, An integrated framework for assessing vulnerability to climate change and developing adaptation strategies for coffee growing families in mesoamerica, PLoS One, 9
  3. Barradas, 1986, Microclimatic chacterization of shaded and open-grown coffee (Coffea arabica L.) plantations in Mexico, Agric. For. Meteorol., 38, 101, 10.1016/0168-1923(86)90052-3 · DOI
  4. Bhagwat, 2008, Agroforestry: a refuge for tropical biodiversity?, Trends Ecol. Evol., 23, 261, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.01.005 · DOI
  5. Bote, 2011, Effects of shade on growth, production and quality of coffee (Coffea arabica) in Ethiopia, J. Hortic. For., 11, 336
  6. Bunn, 2015, A bitter cup: climate change profile of global production of Arabica and Robusta coffee, Clim. Change, 129, 89, 10.1007/s10584-014-1306-x · DOI
  7. Camargo, 1985, O clima e a cafeicultura no Brasil, Inf. Agropec, 11, 13
  8. Cannell, 1976, Crop physiological aspects of coffee bean yield a review, Kenya Coffee, 41, 245
  9. Cardoso, 2001, Continual learning for agroforestry system design: University, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil, Agric. Syst., 69, 235, 10.1016/S0308-521X(01)00028-2 · DOI
  10. Carr, 2001, The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee, Exp. Agric., 37, 1, 10.1017/S0014479701001090 · DOI
  11. Chain-Guadarrama, 2019, Ecosystem services by birds and bees to coffee in a changing climate: a review of coffee berry borer control and pollination, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 280, 53, 10.1016/j.agee.2019.04.011 · DOI
  12. DaMatta, 2004, Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review, Field Crop. Res., 86, 99, 10.1016/j.fcr.2003.09.001 · DOI
  13. DaMatta, 2006, Impacts of drought and temperature stress on coffee physiology and production: a review, Braz. J. Plant Physiol., 18, 55, 10.1590/S1677-04202006000100006 · DOI
  14. Duarte, 2013, Decomposition and nutrient release in leaves of Atlantic Rainforest tree species used in agroforestry systems, Agrofor. Syst., 87, 835, 10.1007/s10457-013-9600-6 · DOI
  15. Gomes, 2016, Trees modify the dynamics of soil CO2 efflux in coffee agroforestry systems, Agric. For. Meteorol., 224, 30, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.001 · DOI
  16. Hijmans, 2005, Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1965, 10.1002/joc.1276 · DOI
  17. Läderach, 2017, Climate change adaptation of coffee production in space and time, Clim. Change, 141, 47, 10.1007/s10584-016-1788-9 · DOI
  18. Lin, 2007, Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture, Agric. For. Meteorol., 144, 85, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.009 · DOI
  19. Lin, 2010, The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems, Agric. For. Meteorol., 150, 510, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.010 · DOI
  20. López-bravo, 2012, Shade is conducive to coffee rust as compared to full sun exposure under standardized fruit load conditions, Crop Prot., 38, 21, 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.03.011 · DOI
  21. Magrach, 2015, Climate and pest-driven geographic shifts in global coffee production: implications for forest cover, biodiversity and carbon storage, PLoS One, 10, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0133071 · DOI
  22. Merow, 2013, A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: what it does, and why inputs and settings matter, Ecography (Cop.), 36, 1058, 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.07872.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. Moreira, 2018, Intercropping of coffee with the palm tree, macauba, can mitigate climate change effects, Agric. For. Meteorol., 256–257, 379, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.03.026 · DOI
  24. Muschler, 2001, Shade improves coffee quality in sub-optimal coffee zone of Costa Rica, Agroforest Syst., 51, 131, 10.1023/A:1010603320653 · DOI
  25. Myers, 2000, Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities, Nature, 403, 853, 10.1038/35002501 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Nair, 1997, Directions in tropical agroforestry research: past, present, and future, Agrofor. Syst., 38, 223, 10.1023/A:1005943729654 · DOI
  27. Ovalle-Rivera, 2015, Projected shifts in Coffea arabica suitability among major global producing regions due to climate change, PLoS One, 10, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0124155 · DOI
  28. Padovan, 2018, Water loss by transpiration and soil evaporation in coffee shaded by Tabebuia rosea Bertol. and Simarouba glauca dc. compared to unshaded coffee in sub-optimal environmental conditions, Agric. For. Meteorol., 248, 1, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.08.036 · DOI
  29. Peterson, 2008, Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling, Ecol. Modell., 213, 63, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Phillips, 2006, Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions, Ecol. Modell., 190, 231, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Rahn, 2018, Exploring adaptation strategies of coffee production to climate change using a process-based model, Ecol. Modell., 371, 76, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.01.009 · DOI
  32. Ramalho, 2018, Why could the coffee crop endure climate change and global warming to a greater extent than previously estimated?, Clim. Change, 152, 167
  33. Rezende, 2014, Extrafloral nectaries of associated trees can enhance natural pest control, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 188, 198, 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.024 · DOI
  34. Schroth, 2009, Towards a climate change adaptation strategy for coffee communities and ecosystems in the Sierra Madre de Chiapas, Mexico. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Chang., 14, 605, 10.1007/s11027-009-9186-5 · DOI
  35. Schroth, 2015, Winner or loser of climate change? A modeling study of current and future climatic suitability of Arabica coffee in Indonesia, Reg. Environ. Change, 15, 1473, 10.1007/s10113-014-0713-x · DOI
  36. Soto-Pinto, 2009, Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico, Agrofor. Syst., 78, 39, 10.1007/s10457-009-9247-5 · DOI
  37. Souza, 2010, Selection of native trees for intercropping with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest biome, Agrofor. Syst., 80, 1, 10.1007/s10457-010-9340-9 · DOI
  38. Souza, 2012, Strategies and economics of farming systems with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest Biome, Agrofor. Syst., 84, 227, 10.1007/s10457-011-9452-x · DOI · Paper page
  39. Souza, 2012, Protective shade, tree diversity and soil properties in coffee agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Rainforest biome, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 146, 179, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.11.007 · DOI
  40. Souza, 2012, Protective shade, tree diversity and soil properties in coffee agroforestry systems in the Atlantic Rainforest biome, Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 146
  41. van Oijen, 2010, Coffee agroforestry systems in Central America: II. Development of a simple process-based model and preliminary results, Agrofor. Syst., 80, 361, 10.1007/s10457-010-9291-1 · DOI
  42. VanDerWal, 2009, Selecting pseudo-absence data for presence-only distribution modeling: how far should you stray from what you know?, Ecol. Modell., 220, 589, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.11.010 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Gomes, L. C., Bianchi, F. J. J. A., Cardoso, I. M., Fernandes, R. B. A., Filho, E. I. F., & Schulte, R. P. O.
ORCID
Venue
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
294
Pages
106858
ISSN
0167-8809
DOI
10.1016/j.agee.2020.106858
Cited by
224
References
1
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa de Minas Gerais (APQ-03348-16)
  • Interdisciplinary Research and Education Fund (INREF) of Wageningen University & Research
  • Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.