CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,526

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rethinking receiver operating characteristic analysis applications in ecological niche modeling

Peterson, A. Townsend, Papeş, Monica, Soberón, Jorge·2008·Ecological Modelling
DOI 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Anderson, 2003, Evaluating predictive models of species’ distributions: criteria for selecting optimal models, Ecol. Model., 162, 211, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00349-6 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 2002, Using niche-based GIS modeling to test geographic predictions of competitive exclusion and competitive release in South American pocket mice, Oikos, 93, 3, 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.t01-1-980116.x · DOI
  3. Araújo, 2006, Five (or so) challenges for species distribution modelling, J. Biogeogr., 33, 1677, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01584.x · DOI
  4. Araújo, 2005, Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change, Global Change Biol., 11, 1504, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.x · DOI
  5. Araújo, 2005, Reducing uncertainty in projections of extinction risk from climate change, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 14, 529, 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2005.00182.x · DOI
  6. Carpenter, 1993, DOMAIN: a flexible modeling procedure for mapping potential distributions of animals and plants, Biodivers. Conserv., 2, 667, 10.1007/BF00051966 · DOI
  7. Dodd, 2003, Partial AUC estimation and regression, Biometrics, 59, 614, 10.1111/1541-0420.00071 · DOI
  8. Elith, 2006, Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data, Ecography, 29, 129, 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. Fielding, 1997, A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models, Environ. Conserv., 24, 38, 10.1017/S0376892997000088 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Graham, 2004, Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs, Evolution, 58, 1781, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb00461.x · DOI
  11. Guisan, 2006, Making better biogeographical predictions of species’ distributions, J. Appl. Ecol., 43, 386, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01164.x · DOI
  12. Guisan, 2005, Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models, Ecol. Lett., 8, 993, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00792.x · DOI
  13. Guisan, 2000, Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology, Ecol. Modell., 135, 147, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00354-9 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hirzel, 2002, Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?, Ecology, 83, 2027, 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2027:ENFAHT]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  15. Jiang, 1996, A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic tests, Radiology, 201, 745, 10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939225 · DOI
  16. Lobo, 2007, AUC: a misleading measure of the performance of predictive distribution models, Global Ecol. Biogeogr.
  17. Lobo, 2006, Environmental and geographical factors affecting the Iberian distribution of flightless Jekelius species (Coleoptera: Geotrupidae), Divers. Distributions, 12, 179, 10.1111/j.1366-9516.2005.00214.x · DOI
  18. Pearson, 2003, Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful?, Global Ecol. Biogeogr., 12, 361, 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. Pearson, 2002, SPECIES: a spatial evaluation of climate impact on the envelope of species, Ecol. Modell., 154, 289, 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00056-X · DOI
  20. Pearson, 2007, Predicting species’ distributions from small numbers of occurrence records: a test case using cryptic geckos in Madagascar, J. Biogeogr., 34, 102, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01594.x · DOI
  21. Pepe, 2000, Receiver operating characteristic methodology, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 95, 308, 10.2307/2669554 · DOI
  22. Peterson, 2006, Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models, Biodivers. Inform., 3, 59, 10.17161/bi.v3i0.29 · DOI
  23. Peterson, 2007, Transferability and model evaluation in ecological niche modeling: a comparison of GARP and Maxent, Ecography, 30, 550, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.05102.x · DOI
  24. Peterson, 2003, Lutzomyia vectors for cutaneous leishmaniasis in southern Brazil: ecological niche models, predicted geographic distributions, and climate change effects, Int. J. Parasitol., 33, 919, 10.1016/S0020-7519(03)00094-8 · DOI
  25. Peterson, 1999, Conservatism of ecological niches in evolutionary time, Science, 285, 1265, 10.1126/science.285.5431.1265 · DOI
  26. Phillips, 2006, Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions, Ecol. Modell., 190, 231, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Raxworthy, 2003, Predicting distributions of known and unknown reptile species in Madagascar, Nature, 426, 837, 10.1038/nature02205 · DOI
  28. Segurado, 2004, An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions, J. Biogeogr., 31, 1555, 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2004.01076.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Soberón, 2004, Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, 359, 689, 10.1098/rstb.2003.1439 · DOI
  30. Soberón, 2005, Interpretation of models of fundamental ecological niches and species’ distributional areas, Biodivers. Inform., 2, 1, 10.17161/bi.v2i0.4 · DOI
  31. Stockwell, 2002, Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models, Ecol. Modell., 148, 1, 10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00388-X · DOI
  32. Stockwell, 2003, Comparison of resolution of methods used in mapping biodiversity patterns from point occurrence data, Ecol. Indicators, 3, 213, 10.1016/S1470-160X(03)00045-1 · DOI
  33. Thuiller, 2005, Niche-based modelling as a tool for predicting the risk of alien plant invasions at a global scale, Global Change Biol., 11, 2234, 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.001018.x · DOI
  34. Wiens, 2004, Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species, Evolution, 58, 193, 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01586.x · DOI
  35. Wiens, 2005, Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst., 36, 519, 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102803.095431 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Peterson, A. T., Papeş, M., & Soberón, J.
Venue
Ecological Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
63-72
ISSN
0304-3800
DOI
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2007.11.008
Cited by
1,526
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review