Cited by 16Agricultural Science and FertilizationSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsSustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis

Livelihood and climate trade-offs in Kenyan peri-urban vegetable production

Open access
Kurgat, Barnabas K., Stöber, Silke, Mwonga, Samuel, Lotze-Campen, Hermann, Rosenstock, Todd S.·2018·Agricultural Systems

Abstract

Trade-offs between livelihood and environmental outcomes due to agricultural intensification in sub-Saharan Africa are uncertain. The present study measured yield, economic performance and nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions in African indigenous vegetable (AIV) production to investigate the optimal nutrient management strategies. In order to achieve this, an on-farm experiment with four treatments – (1) 40 kg N/ha diammonium phosphate (DAP), (2) 10 t/ha cattle manure, (3) 20 kg N/ha DAP and 5 t/ha cattle manure and (4) a no-N input control – was performed for two seasons. Yields and N 2 O emissions were directly measured with subsampling and static chambers/gas chromatography, respectively. Economic outcomes were estimated from semi-structured interviews (N = 12). Trade-offs were quantified by calculating N 2 O emissions intensity (N 2 OI) and N 2 O emissions economic intensity (N 2 OEI). The results indicate that, DAP alone resulted at least 14% greater yields, gross margin and returns to labour in absolute terms but had the highest emissions (p = 0.003). Productivity-climate trade-offs, expressed as N 2 OI, were statistically similar for DAP and mixed treatments. However, N 2 OEI was minimized under mixed management (p = 0.0004) while maintaining productivity and gross margins. We therefore conclude that soil fertility management strategies that mix inorganic and organic source present a pathway to sustainable intensification in AIV production. Future studies of GHG emissions in crop production need to consider not only productivity but economic performance when considering trade-offs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.agsy.2017.10.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Kenya, using manure in indigenous vegetable farms generated lower gross output compared to using diammonium phosphate as fertiliser.

    “In an example in Kenya, using manure in indigenous vegetable farms generated lower gross output compared to using diammonium phosphate as fertiliser (Kurgat et al. 2018).”

    From The socio-economic performance of agroecology. A review (2024) · cites this paper as Kurgat et al. 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Robertson, G.P., Groffman, P.M., 2007. Nitrogen transformation. In: Paul, E.A. (Ed.), Soil Microbiology, Biochemistry and Ecology. Springer, New York, USA, pp. 341-364.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kurgat, B. K., Stöber, S., Mwonga, S., Lotze-Campen, H., & Rosenstock, T. S.
Affiliations
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • Egerton University (KE)
  • Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security (KE)
Corresponding author
Kurgat, Barnabas K.
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
160
Pages
79-86
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2767712666
Cited by
16
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RENATE (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Publication Database PIK (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK)) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
  • RENATE
Funders
Global Food Security programme (FKZ 031A248A)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Agricultural Science and Fertilization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
Keywords
African indigenous vegetables, peri-urban agriculture, nitrous oxide emissions, nutrient management, cattle manure, diammonium phosphate, soil fertility management, economic performance, gross margin, returns to labor, sustainable intensification, greenhouse gas intensity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review