The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps
Open accessAbstract
Global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems aim to provide up-to-date information regarding food production to different actors and decision makers in support of global and national food security. To help reduce price volatility of the kind experienced between 2007 and 2011, a global system of agricultural monitoring systems is needed to ensure the coordinated flow of information in a timely manner for early warning purposes. A number of systems now exist that fill this role. This paper provides an overview of the eight main global and regional scale agricultural monitoring systems currently in operation and compares them based on the input data and models used, the outputs produced and other characteristics such as the role of the analyst, their interaction with other systems and the geographical scale at which they operate. Despite improvements in access to high resolution satellite imagery over the last decade and the use of numerous remote-sensing based products by the different systems, there are still fundamental gaps. Based on a questionnaire, discussions with the system experts and the literature, we present the main gaps in the data and in the methods. Finally, we propose some recommendations for addressing these gaps through ongoing improvements in remote sensing, harnessing new and innovative data streams and the continued sharing of more and more data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People
Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Pretty, J., Robinson, S., Thomas, S. M., & Toulmin, C. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1185383 · Cited by 11,943
SoilGrids250m: Global gridded soil information based on machine learning
Hengl, T., Mendes de Jesus, J., Heuvelink, G. B. M., Ruiperez Gonzalez, M., Kilibarda, M., Blagotić, A., Shangguan, W., Wright, M. N., Geng, X., Bauer-Marschallinger, B., et al. (2017) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0169748 · Cited by 4,733
Closing yield gaps through nutrient and water management
Mueller, N. D., Gerber, J. S., Johnston, M., Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., & Foley, J. A. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11420 · Cited by 2,827
Farming the planet: 1. Geographic distribution of global agricultural lands in the year 2000
Ramankutty, N., Evan, A. T., Monfreda, C., & Foley, J. A. (2008) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2007gb002952 · Cited by 1,942
Recent patterns of crop yield growth and stagnation
Ray, D. K., Ramankutty, N., Mueller, N. D., West, P. C., & Foley, J. A. (2012) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms2296 · Cited by 1,595
Portmann, F. T., Siebert, S., & Döll, P. (2010) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2008gb003435 · Cited by 1,561
Boryan, C., Yang, Z., Mueller, R., & Craig, M. (2011) · Geocarto International · doi:10.1080/10106049.2011.562309 · Cited by 1,212
Atzberger, C. (2013) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs5020949 · Cited by 1,031
Crop planting dates: an analysis of global patterns
Sacks, W. J., Deryng, D., Foley, J. A., & Ramankutty, N. (2010) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00551.x · Cited by 957
Lu, C., & Tian, H. (2017) · Earth System Science Data · doi:10.5194/essd-9-181-2017 · Cited by 821
Cited by
Defourny, P., Bontemps, S., Bellemans, N., Cara, C., Dedieu, G., Guzzonato, E., Hagolle, O., Inglada, J., Nicola, L., Rabaute, T., et al. (2019) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.007 · Cited by 423
Metadata
- Authors
- Fritz, S., See, L., Bayas, J. C. L., Waldner, F., Jacques, D., Becker-Reshef, I., Whitcraft, A., Baruth, B., Bonifacio, R., Crutchfield, J., Rembold, F., Rojas, O., Schucknecht, A., Van der Velde, M., Verdin, J., Wu, B., Yan, N., You, L., Gilliams, S., Mücher, S., Tetrault, R., Moorthy, I., & McCallum, I.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-01
- Volume
- 168
- Pages
- 258-272
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2884526666
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 63
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.010
- The paper
- Fritz, S., See, L., Bayas, J. C. L., Waldner, F., Jacques, D., Becker-Reshef, I., Whitcraft, A., Baruth, B., Bonifacio, R., Crutchfield, J., Rembold, F., Rojas, O., Schucknecht, A., Van der Velde, M., Verdin, J., Wu, B., Yan, N., You, L., Gilliams, S., . . . McCallum, I. (2019). A comparison of global agricultural monitoring systems and current gaps. Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2018.05.010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
