The DOI matches its Crossref record; 89 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review
Open accessAbstract
Digitalisation is widely regarded as having the potential to provide productivity and sustainability gains for the agricultural sector. However, there are likely to be broader implications arising from the digitalisation of agricultural innovation systems. Agricultural knowledge and advice networks are important components of agricultural innovation systems that have the potential to be digitally disrupted. In this paper, we review trends within agricultural knowledge and advice networks both internationally and in Australia, to anticipate and prepare for potential transformations in these networks. Through a combined structured and traditional review of relevant literature, we come to three key conclusions regarding the state-of-the-art. First, the connectivity of humans and technologies in agricultural knowledge and advice networks and value chains will likely continue to increase. Second, transparency of agricultural practices and informational interaction between farmers, advisors, agri-businesses, consumers and regulators will drive and be driven by growing connectivity. Finally, there are likely to be challenges balancing the priorities of various agricultural stakeholders as agricultural innovation systems digitalise. These findings have implications for the oversight of international agri-food sectors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
Big Data in Smart Farming – A review
Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M.-J. (2017) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023 · Cited by 3,378
Intermediation and the role of intermediaries in innovation
Howells, J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.03.005 · Cited by 2,053
Innovation management measurement: A review
Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2006.00119.x · Cited by 1,369
Rifkin, J. (2011) · Cited by 1,321
Klerkx, L., Jakku, E., & Labarthe, P. (2019) · NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.njas.2019.100315 · Cited by 1,307
Self-citationSmart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture
Walter, A., Finger, R., Huber, R., & Buchmann, N. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1707462114 · Cited by 789
Building bridges for innovation: the role of consultants in technology transfer
Bessant, J., & Rush, H. (1995) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(93)00751-e · Cited by 754
Evolution of systems approaches to agricultural innovation: concepts, analysis and interventions
Klerkx, L., van Mierlo, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2012) · Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_20 · Cited by 705
Klerkx, L., & Leeuwis, C. (2009) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2008.10.001 · Cited by 674
Cited by
Klerkx, L., & Begemann, S. (2020) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102901 · Cited by 354
Agriculture 4.0: Making it work for people, production, and the planet
Rose, D. C., Wheeler, R., Winter, M., Lobley, M., & Chivers, C.-A. (2021) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104933 · Cited by 346
Digital innovation ecosystems in agri-food: design principles and organizational framework
Wolfert, S., Verdouw, C., van Wassenaer, L., Dolfsma, W., & Klerkx, L. (2023) · Agricultural Systems · doi:10.1016/j.agsy.2022.103558 · Cited by 137
Exploring farmers’ decisions to engage in grass measurement on dairy farms in Ireland
Regan, Á., Douglas, J., Maher, J., & O’Dwyer, T. (2021) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2020.1858892 · Cited by 25
Doidge, C., Burrell, A., van Schaik, G., & Kaler, J. (2024) · animal · doi:10.1016/j.animal.2024.101124 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Fielke, S., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E.
- Venue
- Agricultural Systems
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 180
- Pages
- 102763
- ISSN
- 0308-521X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000653370
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 89
- FWCI
- 48.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763
- The paper
- Fielke, S., Taylor, B., & Jakku, E. (2020). Digitalisation of agricultural knowledge and advice networks: A state-of-the-art review. Agricultural Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2019.102763
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.