Cited by 6Smart Agriculture and AIAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchVeterinary Practice and Education Studies

A qualitative survey approach to investigating beef and dairy veterinarians’ needs in relation to technologies on farms

Open access
Doidge, C., Burrell, A., van Schaik, G., Kaler, J.·2024·animal

Abstract

Globally, farmers are being increasingly encouraged to use technologies. Consequently, veterinarians often use farm data and technologies to provide farmers with advice. Yet very few studies have sought to understand veterinarians' perceptions of data and technologies on farms. The aim of this study was to understand veterinarians' experiences and opinions on data and technology on beef and dairy farms. An online qualitative survey was conducted with a convenience sample of 36 and 24 veterinarians from the United Kingdom and Ireland, respectively. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to generate four themes: (1) Improving veterinary advice through data; (2) Ensuring stock person skills are retained; (3) Longevity of technology; and (4) Solving social problems on farms. We show that technologies and data can make veterinarians feel more confident in the advice they give to farmers. However, the quality and quantity of data collected on cattle farms were highly variable. Furthermore, veterinarians were concerned that farmers can become over-reliant on technologies by not using their stockperson skills. As herd sizes increase, technologies can help to improve working conditions on farms with multiple employees of various skillsets. Veterinarians would like innovations that can help them to demonstrate their competence, influence farmers' behaviour, and ensure sustainability of the beef and dairy industries.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101124

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent surveys of cattle veterinarians in the US and UK have successfully utilised sample sizes of 36 to 97 participants to capture focused professional perspectives.

    “This approach aligns with similar research in the US (9) and the UK, where recent surveys of cattle veterinarians have successfully utilised sample sizes of 36 to 97 participants to capture focused professional perspectives (40, 41).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 85 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doidge, C., Burrell, A., van Schaik, G., & Kaler, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Animal Health Ireland (IE)
Corresponding author
Doidge, C.
Venue
animal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-04
Volume
18
Issue
4
Pages
101124
ISSN
1751-7311 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392615942
Cited by
6
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • animal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Horizon Europe (101000494)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Smart Agriculture and AI
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Agriculture and Rural Development Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Keywords
veterinary advice, farm data, agricultural technology, beef production, dairy farming, veterinarians' perceptions, herd size, farmer behavior change
MeSH terms
Farmers, Farms, Animals, Cattle, Dairying, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Technology, Veterinarians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review