Cited by 67Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart rate and cardiovascular healthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

A review of dyspnea in acute heart failure syndromes

West, Ryenn L., Hernandez, Adrian F., O'Connor, Christopher M., Starling, Randall C., Califf, Robert M.·2010·American Heart Journal

Abstract

In acute heart failure syndrome (AHFS), dyspnea is one of the most common but least understood presenting symptoms for hospitalization. For this reason, dyspnea relief is increasingly becoming a focus in the development of therapies for the treatment of AHFS, and currently stands as an acceptable primary end point for regulatory approval by governmental agencies. This raises the question of how best to measure such a subjective symptom. In this review, we will describe the basis for dyspnea, provide a detailed description of the strengths and weaknesses of the current best tools used to measure it, and describe future directions for future development of dyspnea measurement in AHFS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.05.020

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many dyspnoea questionnaires have been validated for reproducibility with some correlating to prognosis, but in general they lack sensitivity to acute changes in dyspnoea or specificity to CHF, with some too long or under copyright to be practical for routine clinical use.

    “While many of these questionnaires have been validated for reproducibility with some correlating to prognosis, in general, they lack sensitivity to acute changes in dyspnoea or specificity to CHF with some too long or under copyright to be practical for routine clinical use. 51”
  • There is no agreed questionnaire for dyspnoea in CHF.

    “There is no agreed questionnaire for dyspnoea in CHF, 51”
  • Breathlessness can be episodic or continuous, ranging from an uncomfortable awareness of breathing to a feeling of suffocation or breathlessness.

    “Breathlessness can be episodic or continuous, ranging from an uncomfortable awareness of breathing to a feeling of suffocation or breathlessness. 1 , 10 , 51”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
West, R. L., Hernandez, A. F., O'Connor, C. M., Starling, R. C., & Califf, R. M.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Hernandez, Adrian F.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
160
Issue
2
Pages
209-214
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110393231
Cited by
67
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
6.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
dyspnea, acute heart failure, symptom assessment, dyspnea relief, primary endpoint, regulatory approval, subjective symptoms
MeSH terms
Dyspnea, Health Status Indicators, Heart Failure, Humans, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Severity of Illness Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review