Cited by 231Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsHeart rate and cardiovascular health

Clinical outcome endpoints in heart failure trials: a European Society of Cardiology Heart Failure Association consensus document

Zannad, Faiez, Garcia, Angeles Alonso, Anker, Stefan D., Armstrong, Paul W., Calvo, Gonzalo, Cleland, John G.F., Cohn, Jay N., Dickstein, Kenneth +32 more·2013·European Journal of Heart Failure

Abstract

Endpoint selection is a critically important step in clinical trial design. It poses major challenges for investigators, regulators, and study sponsors, and it also has important clinical and practical implications for physicians and patients. Clinical outcomes of interest in heart failure trials include all-cause mortality, cause-specific mortality, relevant non-fatal morbidity (e.g., all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization), composites capturing both morbidity and mortality, safety, symptoms, functional capacity, and patient-reported outcomes. Each of these endpoints has strengths and weaknesses that create controversies regarding which is most appropriate in terms of clinical importance, sensitivity, reliability, and consistency. Not surprisingly, a lack of consensus exists within the scientific community regarding the optimal endpoint(s) for both acute and chronic heart failure trials. In an effort to address these issues, the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-ESC) convened a group of expert heart failure clinical investigators, biostatisticians, regulators, and pharmaceutical industry scientists (Nice, France, 12-13 February 2012) to evaluate the challenges of defining heart failure endpoints in clinical trials and to develop a consensus framework. This report summarizes the group's recommendations for achieving common views on heart failure endpoints in clinical trials.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/eurjhf/hft095

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Outstanding issues around existing patient-reported outcomes that may explain the relative lack of uptake include cost, copyright, practical implementation, lack of breadth of symptoms, challenges around presentation, issues around credibility of results, and the focus on survival for approval of new interventions.

    “Outstanding issues around existing PROs that may explain the relative lack of uptake include cost, copyright, practical implementation, lack of breadth of symptoms, challenges around presentation, issues around credibility of results, and the focus on survival for approval of new interventions. 119”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zannad, F., Garcia, A. A., Anker, S. D., Armstrong, P. W., Calvo, G., Cleland, J. G. F., Cohn, J. N., Dickstein, K., Domanski, M. J., Ekman, I., Filippatos, G. S., Gheorghiade, M., Hernandez, A. F., Jaarsma, T., Koglin, J., Konstam, M., Kupfer, S., Maggioni, A. P., Mebazaa, A., Metra, M., Nowack, C., Pieske, B., Piña, I. L., Pocock, S. J., Ponikowski, P., Rosano, G., Ruilope, L. M., Ruschitzka, F., Severin, T., Solomon, S., Stein, K., Stockbridge, N. L., Stough, W. G., Swedberg, K., Tavazzi, L., Voors, A. A., Wasserman, S. M., Woehrle, H., Zalewski, A., & McMurray, J. J. V.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • European Medicines Agency (NL)
  • Stiftung Charité (DE)
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES)
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Stavanger University Hospital (NO)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • University General Hospital Attikon (GR)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) (US)
  • Tufts University (US)
  • Takeda (United States) (US)
  • Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (IT)
  • Hôpital Lariboisière (FR)
  • University of Brescia (IT)
  • Bayer (Germany) (DE)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Montefiore Medical Center (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
  • Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
  • Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre (ES)
  • University Hospital Zurich (CH)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Boston Scientific Corporation , St. Paul, MN ,
  • United States Food and Drug Administration (US)
  • Campbell University (US)
  • Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
  • Maria Cecilia Hospital (IT)
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • Amgen (United States) (US)
  • ResMed (Germany) (DE)
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation , East Hanover, NJ ,
  • Western Infirmary (GB)
Corresponding author
Zannad, Faiez
Venue
European Journal of Heart Failure
Published
2013-10-01
Volume
15
Issue
10
Pages
1082-1094
ISSN
  • 1388-9842 (ISSN-L)
  • 1879-0844
OpenAlex
W2072345235
Cited by
231
References
111
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Heart Failure (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Brescia) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10227)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart rate and cardiovascular health
Keywords
heart failure, clinical trial endpoints, endpoint selection, all-cause mortality, hospitalization, composite endpoints, patient-reported outcomes, functional capacity, acute heart failure, chronic heart failure, consensus framework
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Recurrence, Outcome Assessment, Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review