Cited by 62Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Minimally clinically important difference in chronic breathlessness: Every little helps

Oxberry, Stephen G., Bland, J. Martin, Clark, Andrew L., Cleland, John G.F., Johnson, Miriam J.·2012·American Heart Journal

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to determine the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) for breathlessness due to chronic heart failure (CHF).Background The measurement of breathlessness is difficult because it is subjective and multifactorial. Statistically significant changes in assessment may not be clinically meaningful. This is the first determination of MCID in chronic breathlessness in CHF using patient-rated data.Methods Measurements were made as part of a randomized, controlled, crossover trial of morphine, oxycodone, or placebo for breathlessness in CHF. Breathlessness intensity was assessed at baseline and at the end of each intervention (day 4) using 11-point numerical rating scales (NRS), modified Borg (mBorg) scales, and global impression of change (GC) in breathlessness at day 4. From these data, the change in NRS or mBorg associated with a 1-point change in GC was calculated.Results Thirty-five patients completed all study interventions, resulting in 105 data sets. We defined MCID as a 1-point change in GC. Regression analysis found that the MCID, including 95% CIs, equaled change in average NRS breathlessness per 24 hours of 0.5 to 2.0 U (P < .001), change in worst NRS breathlessness per 24 hours of 0.4 to 2.9 (P < .001), change in average mBorg score of 0.2 to 2.0 (P < .001), and change in worst mBorg score as between 0.3 and 1.9 (P < .001). Corresponding effect size calculations lay within the 95% CIs for the regression analysis for each measure.Conclusions A 1-point change in NRS or mBorg score is a reasonable estimate of the MCID in average daily chronic breathlessness in CHF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.05.003

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oxberry, S. G., Bland, J. M., Clark, A. L., Cleland, J. G. F., & Johnson, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Kirkwood Hospice (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Miriam J.
Venue
American Heart Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
164
Issue
2
Pages
229-235
ISSN
0002-8703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2147441553
Cited by
62
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Heart Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0611-10227)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
minimal clinically important difference, chronic breathlessness, chronic heart failure, numerical rating scale, modified Borg scale, global impression of change, patient-reported outcomes, morphine, oxycodone, opioid analgesia
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Dyspnea, Heart Failure, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review