The DOI matches its Crossref record; 322 of the 322 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications
Open accessAbstract
Lots of learning tasks require dealing with graph data which contains rich relation information among elements. Modeling physics systems, learning molecular fingerprints, predicting protein interface, and classifying diseases demand a model to learn from graph inputs. In other domains such as learning from non-structural data like texts and images, reasoning on extracted structures (like the dependency trees of sentences and the scene graphs of images) is an important research topic which also needs graph reasoning models. Graph neural networks (GNNs) are neural models that capture the dependence of graphs via message passing between the nodes of graphs. In recent years, variants of GNNs such as graph convolutional network (GCN), graph attention network (GAT), graph recurrent network (GRN) have demonstrated ground-breaking performances on many deep learning tasks. In this survey, we propose a general design pipeline for GNN models and discuss the variants of each component, systematically categorize the applications, and propose four open problems for future research.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The K M prediction model uses a graph neural network (GNN) 71 , 72 to create a 50-dimensional task-specific fingerprint of the substrate.”
From Turnover number predictions for kinetically uncharacterized enzymes using machine and deep learning (2023) · cites this paper as [71]
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition
Lecun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/5.726791 · Cited by 58,805
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Self-citationImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge
Russakovsky, O., Deng, J., Su, H., Krause, J., Satheesh, S., Ma, S., Huang, Z., Karpathy, A., Khosla, A., Bernstein, M., et al. (2015) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y · Cited by 39,380
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Jaeger, 2001, vol. 148, 13
- Khamsi, 2011, vol. 53
- Sun, 2011, Pathsim: Meta Path-Based Top-K Similarity Search in Heterogeneous Information Networks, vol. 4, 992
- Ying, 2019, Generating explanations for graph neural networks, Proceedings of NeurIPS, 9244
- You, 2018, Generating realistic graphs with deep auto-regressive models, Proceedings of ICML, 5694
- Zhang, 2019, Oag: toward linking large-scale heterogeneous entity graphs, Proceedings of KDD, 2585
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Deep Learning for Generic Object Detection: A Survey
Liu, L., Ouyang, W., Wang, X., Fieguth, P., Chen, J., Liu, X., & Pietikäinen, M. (2020) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1007/s11263-019-01247-4 · Cited by 2,965
A review of uncertainty quantification in deep learning: Techniques, applications and challenges
Abdar, M., Pourpanah, F., Hussain, S., Rezazadegan, D., Liu, L., Ghavamzadeh, M., Fieguth, P., Cao, X., Khosravi, A., Acharya, U. R., et al. (2021) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,111
Simplifying Graph Convolutional NetworksPreprint
Wu, F., Zhang, T., Junior, A. H. D. S., Fifty, C., Yu, T., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.07153 · Cited by 2,307
Graph convolutional networks: a comprehensive review
Zhang, S., Tong, H., Xu, J., & Maciejewski, R. (2019) · Computational Social Networks · doi:10.1186/s40649-019-0069-y · Cited by 1,888
Diffusion Models: A Comprehensive Survey of Methods and Applications
Yang, L., Zhang, Z., Song, Y., Hong, S., Xu, R., Zhao, Y., Zhang, W., Cui, B., & Yang, M.-H. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626235 · Cited by 1,704
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., Zhang, Z., Yang, C., Liu, Z., Wang, L., Li, C., & Sun, M.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
- Tencent (China) (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Zhiyuan
- ORCID
- Venue
- AI Open
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020
- Volume
- 1
- Pages
- 57-81
- ISSN
- 2666-6510 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3152893301
- Cited by
- 6,880
- References
- 311
- Citations by year
- 2026: 960 · 2025: 1372 · 2024: 1378 · 2023: 1123 · 2022: 872 · 2021: 702 · 2020: 363
- FWCI
- 300.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AI Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Graph Theory and Algorithms
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
- Keywords
- graph neural networks, graph convolutional networks, graph attention networks, message passing, graph reasoning, molecular fingerprints, protein interface prediction, disease classification, dependency trees, scene graph
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
