Cited by 21Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and OutcomesChronic Disease Management Strategies

Health care utilization before and after an outpatient ED visit in older people

Open access
Horney, Carolyn, Schmader, Kenneth, Sanders, Linda L., Heflin, Mitchell, Ragsdale, Luna, McConnell, Eleanor, Hocker, Michael, Hastings, S. Nicole·2012·The American Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Background Older adults in the United States receive a significant amount of care in the emergency department (ED), yet the associations between ED and other types of health care utilization have not been adequately studied in this population.Objectives The goals of this study were to examine the relationships between health care use before and after an ED visit among older adults.Methods This retrospective cohort study examined health care use among 308 patients 65 years or older discharged from a university-affiliated ED. Proportional-hazards models were used to assess the relationship between pre-ED health care use (primary care physician [PCP], specialist, ED, and hospital) and risk of return ED visits.Results Older ED patients in this study had visited other types of providers frequently in the previous year (median number of PCP and specialist visits, 4). Patients who used the ED on 2 or more occasions in the previous year were found to have visited their PCP more often than those without frequent ED use (median number of visits, 7.0 vs 4.0; P < .001). Despite more PCP use in this population, frequent ED use was associated with increased risk of a repeat ED visit (hazard ratio, 2.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.21), in models adjusted for demographics and health status.Conclusion Older adults who use the ED are also receiving significant amounts of care from other sources; simply providing additional access to care may not improve outcomes for these vulnerable individuals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.10.036

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Horney, C., Schmader, K., Sanders, L. L., Heflin, M., Ragsdale, L., McConnell, E., Hocker, M., & Hastings, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • Durham VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Horney, Carolyn
  • Hastings, S. Nicole
Venue
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
135-142
ISSN
0735-6757 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2068021510
Cited by
21
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (RCD 06-019)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024128)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Keywords
emergency department utilization, older adults, health care utilization, primary care visits, specialist visits, repeat emergency department visits, hospitalization, health care access, care fragmentation
MeSH terms
Aged, Delivery of Health Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Chi-Square Distribution, Proportional Hazards Models, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review