Cited by 1,119Emergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and OutcomesFrailty in Older Adults

Older adults in the emergency department: a systematic review of patterns of use, adverse outcomes, and effectiveness of interventions

Aminzadeh, Faranak, Dalziel, William Burd·2002·Annals of Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Study objective We sought to synthesize the literature on patterns of use of emergency services among older adults, risk factors associated with adverse health outcomes, and effectiveness of intervention strategies targeting this population.Methods Relevant articles were identified by means of an English-language search of MEDLINE, HealthSTAR, CINAHL, Current Contents, and Cochrane Library databases from January 1985 to January 2001. This search was supplemented with literature from reference sections of the retrieved publications. A qualitative approach was used to synthesize the literature.Results Compared with younger persons, older adults use emergency services at a higher rate, their visits have a greater level of urgency, they have longer stays in the emergency department, they are more likely to be admitted or to have repeat ED visits, and they experience higher rates of adverse health outcomes after discharge. The risk factors commonly associated with the negative outcomes are age, functional impairment, recent hospitalization or ED use, living alone, and lack of social support. Comprehensive geriatric screening and coordinated discharge planning initiatives designed to improve clinical outcomes in older emergency patients have provided inconclusive results.Conclusion Older ED patients have distinct patterns of service use and care needs. The current disease-oriented and episodic models of emergency care do not adequately respond to the complex care needs of frail older patients. More research is needed to determine the effectiveness of screening and intervention strategies targeting at-risk older ED patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1067/mem.2002.121523

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aminzadeh, F., & Dalziel, W. B.
Venue
Annals of Emergency Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-03
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
238-247
ISSN
0196-0644 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166332563
Cited by
1,119
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 38 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 73 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 62 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 62 · 2014: 66 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 53
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
older adults, emergency department utilization, emergency department visits, adverse health effects, functional disability, social support, living alone, geriatric screening, discharge planning, emergency department length of stay, hospitalization, frailty, risk factors
MeSH terms
Aged, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Risk Factors, Geriatric Assessment, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review