Genotype-Specific Recurrence Risks as Indicators of the Genetic Architecture of Complex Diseases
Open accessAbstract
A statistic is introduced that relates discoveries made in genome-wide association (GWA) studies to patterns of disease risks among relatives. The genotype-specific recurrence risk (GSR) is the genotype-specific risk to relatives of known relationship to affected probands. The GSRs can be used for three purposes. (1) They can provide an independent test of whether an allele identified in a GWA study is associated with the disease. (2) They can provide a test of whether interactions among loci affecting the disease are multiplicative. (3) They can be used by genetic counselors to incorporate information from GWA studies for predicting the risk to relatives of known genotype. Under a multiplicative model of disease causation, the GSRs for a locus are the genotypic risks in probands for that locus multiplied by lambda(R)/lambda(jR), where lambda(R) is Risch's recurrence risk ratio and lambda(jR) is the contribution to lambda(R) from the locus of interest. If there is saturation of risk with increasing numbers of causative alleles, then observed GSRs for individuals with high-risk genotypes will be lower than predicted by the multiplicative model.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The rare allele model must explain population association data and fit demographic distributions within and among families, and there is little theory supporting that it can do both.
“Nevertheless, the rare allele model must not only explain association data in populations, but also fit demographic distributions of disease within and among families, and there is little theory supporting the claim that they can do both55–57.”
From Rare and common variants: twenty arguments (2012) · cites this paper as [56]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, Management Committee, Burton, P. R., Clayton, D. G., Cardon, L. R., Craddock, N., Deloukas, P., Duncanson, A., Kwiatkowski, D. P., McCarthy, M. I., et al. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05911 · Cited by 9,442 · see citing works
The Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium, U.K.
Mossman, K. (2008) · Scientific American · doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0108-42a · Cited by 2,714 · see citing works
Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. I. Multilocus models.
RISCH, N. J. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 1,315 · see citing works
Linkage strategies for genetically complex traits. II. The power of affected relative pairs.
RISCH, N. J. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 868 · see citing works
The Prevalence of Age-related Maculopathy in the Rotterdam Study
Vingerling, J. R., Dielemans, I., Hofman, A., Grobbee, D. E., Hijmering, M., Kramer, C. F. L., & de Jong, P. T. V. M. (1995) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(95)31034-2 · Cited by 815 · see citing works
Maller, J., George, S., Purcell, S., Fagerness, J., Altshuler, D., Daly, M. J., & Seddon, J. M. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1873 · Cited by 599 · see citing works
Large Upward Bias in Estimation of Locus-Specific Effects from Genomewide Scans
Göring, H. H. H., Terwilliger, J. D., & Blangero, J. (2001) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/324471 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
RISCH, N. J. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Multiplex Relative Risk and Estimation of the Number of Loci Underlying an Inherited Disease
Schliekelman, P., & Slatkin, M. (2002) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/344779 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationClerget‐Darpoux, F., & Elston, R. C. (2007) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000101960 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
The Relationship between the Sibling Recurrence-Risk Ratio and Genotype Relative Risk
Rybicki, B. A., & Elston, R. C. (2000) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1086/302778 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Exchangeable Models of Complex Inherited Diseases
Slatkin, M. (2008) · Genetics · doi:10.1534/genetics.107.077719 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Self-citationFamilial recurrence rates and genetic models of multiple sclerosis
Lindsey, J. W. (2005) · American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A · doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30702 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rare and common variants: twenty arguments
Gibson, G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3118 · Cited by 1,278 · see citing works
Signatures of negative selection in the genetic architecture of human complex traits
Zeng, J., de Vlaming, R., Wu, Y., Robinson, M. R., Lloyd-Jones, L. R., Yengo, L., Yap, C. X., Xue, A., Sidorenko, J., McRae, A. F., et al. (2018) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-018-0101-4 · Cited by 391 · see citing works
- Authors
- Slatkin, M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Slatkin, Montgomery
- ORCID
- Slatkin, Montgomery
- Venue
- The American Journal of Human Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-07
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 120-126
- ISSN
- 0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2443843
- OpenAlex
- W2152781144
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM040282)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Keywords
- genome-wide association study, genetic counseling
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alleles, Chromosome Mapping, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 10, Computer Simulation, Gene Frequency, Genes, Genetics, Population, Genotype, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Mathematics, Models, Genetic, Netherlands, Recurrence, Risk, Prevalence, Case-Control Studies, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Siblings
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review