Cited by 315Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesCongenital heart defects researchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Contribution of Global Rare Copy-Number Variants to the Risk of Sporadic Congenital Heart Disease

Open access
Soemedi, Rachel, Wilson, Ian J., Bentham, Jamie, Darlay, Rebecca, Töpf, Ana, Zelenika, Diana, Cosgrove, Catherine, Setchfield, Kerry +23 more·2012·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that copy-number variants (CNVs) contribute to the risk of complex developmental phenotypes. However, the contribution of global CNV burden to the risk of sporadic congenital heart disease (CHD) remains incompletely defined. We generated genome-wide CNV data by using Illumina 660W-Quad SNP arrays in 2,256 individuals with CHD, 283 trio CHD-affected families, and 1,538 controls. We found association of rare genic deletions with CHD risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.8, p = 0.0008). Rare deletions in study participants with CHD had higher gene content (p = 0.001) with higher haploinsufficiency scores (p = 0.03) than they did in controls, and they were enriched with Wnt-signaling genes (p = 1 × 10(-5)). Recurrent 15q11.2 deletions were associated with CHD risk (OR = 8.2, p = 0.02). Rare de novo CNVs were observed in ~5% of CHD trios; 10 out of 11 occurred on the paternally transmitted chromosome (p = 0.01). Some of the rare de novo CNVs spanned genes known to be involved in heart development (e.g., HAND2 and GJA5). Rare genic deletions contribute ~4% of the population-attributable risk of sporadic CHD. Second to previously described CNVs at 1q21.1, deletions at 15q11.2 and those implicating Wnt signaling are the most significant contributors to the risk of sporadic CHD. Rare de novo CNVs identified in CHD trios exhibit paternal origin bias.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.08.003

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Soemedi, R., Topf, A., Wilson, I.J., Darlay, R., Rahman, T., Glen, E., Hall, D., Huang, N., Bentham, J., Bhattacharya, S., et al. (2012). Phenotype-specific effect of chromosome 1q21.1 rear- rangements and GJA5 duplications in 2436 congenital heart The American Journal of Human Genetics 91, 489-501, September 7, 2012 499 disease patients and 6760 controls. Hum. Mol. Genet. 21, 1513-1520.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soemedi, R., Wilson, I. J., Bentham, J., Darlay, R., Töpf, A., Zelenika, D., Cosgrove, C., Setchfield, K., Thornborough, C., Granados-Riveron, J., Blue, G. M., Breckpot, J., Hellens, S., Zwolinkski, S., Glen, E., Mamasoula, C., Rahman, T. J., Hall, D., Rauch, A., Devriendt, K., Gewillig, M., O’ Sullivan, J., Winlaw, D. S., Bu’Lock, F., Brook, J. D., Bhattacharya, S., Lathrop, M., Santibanez-Koref, M., Cordell, H. J., Goodship, J. A., & Keavney, B. D.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Glenfield Hospital (GB)
  • Children's Hospital at Westmead (AU)
  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Leuven (BE)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Goodship, Judith A.
  • Keavney, Bernard D.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
91
Issue
3
Pages
489-501
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076479322
Cited by
315
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 2
FWCI
19.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (087436, 090532)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • British Heart Foundation (RG/08/012/25941, RG/07/010/23676, RG/10/17/28553, PG/07/045/22690)
  • Heart Research UK
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Congenital heart defects research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
congenital heart disease, copy number variation, de novo CNVs, haploinsufficiency, Wnt signaling, 1q21.1, Hand2, connexin 40, population attributable risk, heart development
MeSH terms
Child, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 15, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 8, Fathers, Female, Heart Defects, Congenital, Humans, Male, Gene Deletion, Gene Dosage, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review