Cited by 33Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

Integrative Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis Uncovers Regulatory Mechanisms of Autoimmune Disease

Open access
Shooshtari, Parisa, Huang, Hailiang, Cotsapas, Chris·2017·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases (AID) have uncovered hundreds of loci mediating risk. These associations are preferentially located in non-coding DNA regions and in particular in tissue-specific DNase I hypersensitivity sites (DHSs). While these analyses clearly demonstrate the overall enrichment of disease risk alleles on gene regulatory regions, they are not designed to identify individual regulatory regions mediating risk or the genes under their control, and thus uncover the specific molecular events driving disease risk. To do so we have departed from standard practice by identifying regulatory regions which replicate across samples and connect them to the genes they control through robust re-analysis of public data. We find significant evidence of regulatory potential in 78/301 (26%) risk loci across nine autoimmune and inflammatory diseases, and we find that individual genes are targeted by these effects in 53/78 (68%) of these. Thus, we are able to generate testable mechanistic hypotheses of the molecular changes that drive disease risk.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.001

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The vast majority of genome-wide association study loci encode genes obviously active in the immune system, and particularly in the lymphocyte lineage, placing beyond a doubt the nature of multiple sclerosis as autoimmune.

    “The vast majority of GWAS loci encode genes obviously active in the immune system,45, 63 and particularly in the lymphocyte lineage,64 placing beyond a doubt the nature of the disease as autoimmune.”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Significant enrichment of risk alleles on open chromatin elements was detected in 25/48 multiple sclerosis risk loci, due to 177 DNase I hypersensitive sites out of a total of more than 500,000 DHS sites present in all 48 loci.

    “We were able to detect significant enrichment of risk alleles on open chromatin elements in 25/48 MS risk loci and that these were due to 177 DHS, of a total of > 500 000 DHS sites present in all 48 loci.”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

  • Correlating the pattern of accessibility of each of the 177 DNase I hypersensitive sites to gene expression across REMC 56 tissues identified 49 genes in 17/25 loci that show clear evidence of regulation by risk-burdened DHS sites.

    “We then correlated the pattern of accessibility of each of these 177 DHS sites to gene expression across REMC 56 tissues and identified 49 genes in 17/25 loci that show clear evidence of regulation by risk‐burdened DHS sites.”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

  • The DNase I hypersensitive sites are preferentially accessible in immune cell subsets, particularly T cells and their precursors, and the 49 genes are strongly expressed in these tissues.

    “As expected, the DHS are preferentially accessible in immune cell subsets, particularly T cells and their precursors, and the 49 genes are strongly expressed in these tissues.”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

  • A specific DHS site drives risk to MS, type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroiditis in the MND1 locus.

    “a specific DHS site driving risk to MS, type 1 diabetes and autoimmune thyroiditis in the MND1 locus64”

    From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [64]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shooshtari, P., Huang, H., & Cotsapas, C.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Cotsapas, Chris
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-07
Volume
101
Issue
1
Pages
75-86
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2727796273
Cited by
33
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Biogen
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
autoimmune disease, inflammatory diseases, disease risk loci, DNase I hypersensitive sites, regulatory elements, epigenetics, gene expression regulation, non-coding DNA
MeSH terms
Alleles, Autoimmune Diseases, Chromosomes, Human, Pair 6, Deoxyribonuclease I, Humans, Inflammation, Organ Specificity, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Physical Chromosome Mapping, Epigenesis, Genetic, Genome-Wide Association Study, Genetic Loci

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review