Cited by 287Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

De novo mutations in regulatory elements in neurodevelopmental disorders

Open access
Short, Patrick J., McRae, Jeremy F., Gallone, Giuseppe, Sifrim, Alejandro, Won, Hyejung, Geschwind, Daniel H., Wright, Caroline F., Firth, Helen V. +3 more·2018·Nature

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

We previously estimated that 42% of patients with severe developmental disorders carry pathogenic de novo mutations in coding sequences. The role of de novo mutations in regulatory elements affecting genes associated with developmental disorders, or other genes, has been essentially unexplored. We identified de novo mutations in three classes of putative regulatory elements in almost 8,000 patients with developmental disorders. Here we show that de novo mutations in highly evolutionarily conserved fetal brain-active elements are significantly and specifically enriched in neurodevelopmental disorders. We identified a significant twofold enrichment of recurrently mutated elements. We estimate that, genome-wide, 1-3% of patients without a diagnostic coding variant carry pathogenic de novo mutations in fetal brain-active regulatory elements and that only 0.15% of all possible mutations within highly conserved fetal brain-active elements cause neurodevelopmental disorders with a dominant mechanism. Our findings represent a robust estimate of the contribution of de novo mutations in regulatory elements to this genetically heterogeneous set of disorders, and emphasize the importance of combining functional and evolutionary evidence to identify regulatory causes of genetic disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature25983

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct functional genomic exploration of accessible and disease-relevant tissues from patients using RNA sequencing and DNA methylation assays can identify previously cryptic causal genetic variants, particularly in under-explored noncoding regions.

    “Direct functional genomic exploration of accessible and disease-relevant tissues from patients using RNA sequencing and DNA methylation assays30,31 can identify previously cryptic causal genetic variants, particularly in under-explored regions outside protein-coding genes32,33.”

    From A brief history of human disease genetics (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

  • Overlaps with methods that directly assess chromatin are less substantial for comparisons relying on linkage disequilibrium blocks or closest-gene assignment.

    “This is in contrast to comparisons relying on LD blocks or the assignment by the closest gene, where the overlaps with methods that directly assess chromatin are less substantial (Short et al., 2018; Whalen and Pollard, 2018).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Short, P. J., McRae, J. F., Gallone, G., Sifrim, A., Won, H., Geschwind, D. H., Wright, C. F., Firth, H. V., FitzPatrick, D. R., Barrett, J. C., & Hurles, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Western General Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurles, Matthew E.
Venue
Nature
Published
2018-03
Volume
555
Issue
7698
Pages
611-616
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2599110791
Cited by
274
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 6
FWCI
22.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (WT 098051, 098051)
  • Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00007/3)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH105666, R01MH110927, R00MH113823, K99MH113823)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
de novo mutations, regulatory elements, neurodevelopmental disorders, recurrent mutations, rare variants, genetic heterogeneity
MeSH terms
Brain, Developmental Disabilities, Female, Fetus, Humans, Male, Mutation, Regulatory Sequences, Nucleic Acid, Conserved Sequence, Evolution, Molecular, Exome, Neurodevelopmental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review