Cited by 193Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Contribution of Neanderthals to Phenotypic Variation in Modern Humans

Open access
Dannemann, Michael, Kelso, Janet·2017·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Assessing the genetic contribution of Neanderthals to non-disease phenotypes in modern humans has been difficult because of the absence of large cohorts for which common phenotype information is available. Using baseline phenotypes collected for 112,000 individuals by the UK Biobank, we can now elaborate on previous findings that identified associations between signatures of positive selection on Neanderthal DNA and various modern human traits but not any specific phenotypic consequences. Here, we show that Neanderthal DNA affects skin tone and hair color, height, sleeping patterns, mood, and smoking status in present-day Europeans. Interestingly, multiple Neanderthal alleles at different loci contribute to skin and hair color in present-day Europeans, and these Neanderthal alleles contribute to both lighter and darker skin tones and hair color, suggesting that Neanderthals themselves were most likely variable in these traits.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.09.010

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–193 of 193

Metadata

Authors
Dannemann, M., & Kelso, J.
Affiliations
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology (DE)
Corresponding author
Kelso, Janet
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
578-589
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2762049071
Cited by
193
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 1
FWCI
75.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
Neanderthal DNA, Neanderthal introgression, skin color, hair color, height, sleep patterns, mood, smoking status, positive selection, UK Biobank, European populations, phenotypic variability
MeSH terms
Animals, Biological Evolution, Gene Frequency, Hair Color, Haplotypes, Humans, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Skin Pigmentation, Cohort Studies, Linkage Disequilibrium, Genome, Human, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Neanderthals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review