Cited by 33Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyForensic and Genetic ResearchEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Evidence of Polygenic Adaptation in Sardinia at Height-Associated Loci Ascertained from the Biobank Japan

Open access
Chen, Minhui, Sidore, Carlo, Akiyama, Masato, Ishigaki, Kazuyoshi, Kamatani, Yoichiro, Schlessinger, David, Cucca, Francesco, Okada, Yukinori +1 more·2020·The American Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Adult height is one of the earliest putative examples of polygenic adaptation in humans. However, this conclusion was recently challenged because residual uncorrected stratification from large-scale consortium studies was considered responsible for the previously noted genetic difference. It thus remains an open question whether height loci exhibit signals of polygenic adaptation in any human population. We re-examined this question, focusing on one of the shortest European populations, the Sardinians, in addition to mainland European populations. We utilized height-associated loci from the Biobank Japan (BBJ) dataset to further alleviate concerns of biased ascertainment of GWAS loci and showed that the Sardinians remain significantly shorter than expected under neutrality (∼0.22 standard deviation shorter than Utah residents with ancestry from northern and western Europe [CEU] on the basis of polygenic height scores, p = 3.89 × 10-4). We also found the trajectory of polygenic height scores between the Sardinian and the British populations diverged over at least the last 10,000 years (p = 0.0082), consistent with a signature of polygenic adaptation driven primarily by the Sardinian population. Although the polygenic score-based analysis showed a much subtler signature in mainland European populations, we found a clear and robust adaptive signature in the UK population by using a haplotype-based statistic, the trait singleton density score (tSDS), driven by the height-increasing alleles (p = 9.1 × 10-4). In summary, by ascertaining height loci in a distant East Asian population, we further supported the evidence of polygenic adaptation at height-associated loci among the Sardinians. In mainland Europeans, the adaptive signature was detected in haplotype-based analysis but not in polygenic score-based analysis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.014

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within-sibship GWAS data are robust against population stratification.

    “Within-sibship GWAS data are particularly useful in this context as they are robust against population stratification26,27,29.”

    From Within-sibship genome-wide association analyses decrease bias in estimates of direct genetic effects (2022) · cites this paper as [29]

    The retrieved passages have no section or page labels and contain only links or garbled text, not a readable discussion of within-sibship GWAS. Searches for within-sibship and within-family estimates, siblings, and population stratification found no passage in our copy that establishes the claimed robustness. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, M., Sidore, C., Akiyama, M., Ishigaki, K., Kamatani, Y., Schlessinger, D., Cucca, F., Okada, Y., & Chiang, C. W. K.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research (IT)
  • Kyushu University (JP)
  • RIKEN Center for Integrative Medical Sciences (JP)
  • Kyoto University (JP)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Chen, Minhui
  • Chiang, Charleston W.K.
Venue
The American Journal of Human Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
107
Issue
1
Pages
60-71
ISSN
0002-9297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035648213
Cited by
32
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The American Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
polygenic adaptation, adult height, Sardinians, polygenic risk score, population divergence, East Asian populations, Biobank Japan, genetic stratification, European populations
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Alleles, Body Height, Genetics, Population, Haplotypes, Humans, Italy, Japan, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Genome, Human, Biological Specimen Banks, Multifactorial Inheritance, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, White People, Asian People, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review