Cited by 932Evolution and Genetic DynamicsForensic and Genetic ResearchGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation

Open access
Pritchard, Jonathan K., Pickrell, Joseph K., Coop, Graham·2010·Current Biology

Abstract

There has long been interest in understanding the genetic basis of human adaptation. To what extent are phenotypic differences among human populations driven by natural selection? With the recent arrival of large genome-wide data sets on human variation, there is now unprecedented opportunity for progress on this type of question. Several lines of evidence argue for an important role of positive selection in shaping human variation and differences among populations. These include studies of comparative morphology and physiology, as well as population genetic studies of candidate loci and genome-wide data. However, the data also suggest that it is unusual for strong selection to drive new mutations rapidly to fixation in particular populations (the 'hard sweep' model). We argue, instead, for alternatives to the hard sweep model: in particular, polygenic adaptation could allow rapid adaptation while not producing classical signatures of selective sweeps. We close by discussing some of the likely opportunities for progress in the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.055

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effective population size is one of the most important factors limiting the availability of adaptive mutations.

    “As previously noted (Hawks et al. 2007;Karasov et al. 2010;Pritchard et al. 2010), effective population size is one of the most important factors limiting the availability of adaptive mutations.”

    From The timing of pigmentation lightening in Europeans (2013) · cites this paper as Pritchard et al. 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pritchard, J. K., Pickrell, J. K., & Coop, G.
Affiliations
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Pritchard, Jonathan K.
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-02
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
R208-R215
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135370544
Cited by
932
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 72 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 72 · 2013: 51 · 2012: 64
FWCI
32.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH084703)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
human adaptation, positive selection, hard sweeps, soft sweeps, polygenic adaptation, selective sweeps, human population variation, natural selection, candidate loci
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Biological, Genetics, Population, Humans, Selection, Genetic, Multifactorial Inheritance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review