Cited by 54Disaster Response and ManagementViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchTravel-related health issues

How to provide an effective primary health care in fighting against severe acute respiratory syndrome: the experiences of two cities

Open access
Wong, William C.W., Wong, Samuel Y.S., Lee, Albert, Goggins, William B.·2007·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

Objectives This study was designed to compare the response and management of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) by the family physicians of the Hong Kong and the Toronto health systems, and to provide evidence to improve health policy and practices in a newly emerging infectious disease.Methods A questionnaire was sent to family medicine tutors affiliated with either the Chinese University of Hong Kong or the University of Toronto in 2003. The survey questions covered training for SARS, the use of screening tools, an anxiety scale, clinical practices, and demographic data.Results 137 (74.8%) and 51 (34%) doctors from Hong Kong and Toronto replied to the questionnaire, respectively. Most (80-84.6%) had no training in infectious disease control and were not confident in dealing with SARS (68.1-73.5%). In Hong Kong, the screening tools provided by international agencies did not meet the local needs. In Toronto, lack of a centralized hospital admission policy and fully public laboratory probably resulted in appointment cancellation and dissatisfaction. There may be a need for deployment of personnel between institutions but loss of income was not a major concern.Conclusions Sharing the "lessons learned" in different regions during a SARS outbreak will help prepare for the next epidemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.06.009

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [16]Detsky A.S. Naylor C.D. Canada's health care system—reform delayed N Engl J Med 349 2003 804 810 12930935

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wong, W. C. W., Wong, S. Y. S., Lee, A., & Goggins, W. B.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
35
Issue
1
Pages
50-55
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041842852
Cited by
54
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Disaster Response and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Travel-related health issues
Keywords
SARS, primary care, general practitioners, clinical screening tool, physician anxiety, hospital admission policy, public laboratories, health policy, epidemic preparedness, Hong Kong, Toronto
MeSH terms
Adult, Clinical Competence, Data Collection, Disease Outbreaks, Family Practice, Health Policy, Hong Kong, Humans, Learning, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Ontario, Patient Admission, Primary Health Care, Professional Practice, Infection Control, Communicable Diseases, Emerging, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review