Cited by 28Respiratory viral infections researchInfection Control in HealthcarePneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Seasonal variation of respiratory pathogen colonization in asymptomatic health care professionals: A single-center, cross-sectional, 2-season observational study

Open access
Hassoun, Ali, Huff, Matthew D., Weisman, David, Chahal, Khushdeep, Asis, Esmeralda, Stalons, Don, Grigorenko, Elena, Green, Jessica +3 more·2015·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the seasonal variance of potentially pathogenic bacterial and viral organisms in nasopharyngeal specimens obtained from asymptomatic health care professionals (HCPs) during the 2014 winter and summer months. METHODS: Nasopharyngeal specimens from 100 HCPs were collected from Huntsville Hospital (Huntsville, AL) during the winter and from 100 HCPs during the summer. All subjects were tested for 22 viruses and 19 bacteria using Target Enriched Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction. Both seasonal cohorts were composed of students, nurses, physicians, and residents. RESULTS: Of the 100 HCPs tested during the winter, 34 subjects were colonized with at least 1 bacterium, and 11 tested positive for at least 1 virus. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Moraxella catarrhalis, and coronavirus were the most frequently detected potentially infectious agents. Of the 100 HCPs tested during the summer, 37 tested positive for at least 1 bacterium, and 4 tested positive for a viral agent. The most prevalent bacteria were MRSA and Klebsiella pneumonia. CONCLUSION: Nasopharyngeal carriage among asymptomatic HCPs was common, but the frequency and presence of potential pathogens varied with each season. Understanding the colonization and infection potential of upper respiratory organisms is important, particularly for viruses. Although asymptomatic HCPs certainly harbor a number of different potentially infectious agents, future studies are needed to determine whether colonized pathogens are transmitted or initiate infection in at-risk patient populations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2015.04.195

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In contrast, of the 100 subjects tested during the summer, 37 harbored at least one bacterium (mainly MRSA and K. pneumoniae) and four tested positive for one virus.

    “In contrast, of the 100 subjects tested during the summer, 37 harbored at least one bacterium (mainly MRSA and K. pneumoniae) and four tested positive for one virus (116).”
  • The most frequently detected pathogens were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), M. catarrhalis, and coronavirus.

    “The most frequently detected pathogens were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), M. catarrhalis, and coronavirus.”
  • An investigation of the frequency and seasonal variation in bacterial and viral load in asymptomatic healthcare professionals during the winter and summer months showed that of the 100 subjects tested during the winter, 34 were colonized with at least one bacterial species and 11 tested positive for at least one virus.

    “An investigation of the frequency and seasonal variation in bacterial and viral load in asymptomatic healthcare professionals during the winter and summer months showed that of the 100 subjects tested during the winter, 34 were colonized with at least one bacterial species and 11 tested positive for at least one virus.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hassoun, A., Huff, M. D., Weisman, D., Chahal, K., Asis, E., Stalons, D., Grigorenko, E., Green, J., Malone, L. L., Clemmons, S., & Lu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • University of Alabama (US)
  • Universal Sensors (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Huff, Matthew D.
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-08
Volume
43
Issue
8
Pages
865-870
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1656458980
Cited by
28
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Respiratory viral infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Keywords
seasonal variation, nasopharyngeal carriage, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Moraxella catarrhalis, Klebsiella pneumoniae, coronavirus, respiratory viruses, respiratory tract bacteria, hospital staff
MeSH terms
Adult, Alabama, Bacterial Infections, Moraxella catarrhalis, Carrier State, Cross Infection, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Personnel, Hospitals, Humans, Klebsiella, Male, Middle Aged, Nasopharynx, Respiratory Tract Infections, Seasons, Staphylococcus aureus, Virus Diseases, Coronavirus, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review