Cited by 96Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchGut microbiota and health

Respiratory microbiota: addressing clinical questions, informing clinical practice

Open access
Rogers, Geraint B, Shaw, Dominick, Marsh, Robyn L, Carroll, Mary P, Serisier, David J, Bruce, Kenneth D·2015·Thorax

Abstract

Over the last decade, technological advances have revolutionised efforts to understand the role played by microbes in airways disease. With the application of ever more sophisticated techniques, the literature has become increasingly inaccessible to the non-specialist reader, potentially hampering the translation of these gains into improvements in patient care. In this article, we set out the key principles underpinning microbiota research in respiratory contexts and provide practical guidance on how best such studies can be designed, executed and interpreted. We examine how an understanding of the respiratory microbiota both challenges fundamental assumptions and provides novel clinical insights into lung disease, and we set out a number of important targets for ongoing research.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2014-205826

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Individuals with chronic airway diseases (e.g., cystic fibrosis, COPD) have increased bacterial populations in the lungs and differences in the relative abundance of certain species.

    “Individuals with chronic airway diseases (e.g., cystic fibrosis, COPD) have increased bacterial populations in the lungs (77) and differences in the relative abundance of certain species”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, G. B., Shaw, D., Marsh, R. L., Carroll, M. P., Serisier, D. J., & Bruce, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • Charles Darwin University (AU)
  • University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Shaw, Dominick
Venue
Thorax
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2014-07-17
Volume
70
Issue
1
Pages
74-81
ISSN
  • 0040-6376 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-3296
OpenAlex
W2136243031
Cited by
96
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Thorax (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Nottingham
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
Keywords
respiratory microbiota, airway microbiome, lung disease, clinical translation, research design, clinical practice
MeSH terms
Humans, Respiratory System, Immunity, Mucosal, Respiratory Mucosa, Microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review