Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,287

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients

Open access
Sun, Niuniu, Wei, Luoqun, Shi, Suling, Jiao, Dandan, Song, Runluo, Ma, Lili, Wang, Hongwei, Wang, Chao, Wang, Zhaoguo, You, Yanli, Liu, Shuhua, Wang, Hongyun·2020·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is spreading rapidly, bringing pressure and challenges to nursing staff. OBJECTIVE: To explore the psychology of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Using a phenomenological approach, we enrolled 20 nurses who provided care for COVID-19 patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology from January 20, to February 10, 2020. The interviews were conducted face-to-face or by telephone and were analysed by Colaizzi's 7-step method. RESULTS: The psychological experience of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients can be summarized into 4 themes. First, negative emotions present in early stage consisting of fatigue, discomfort, and helplessness was caused by high-intensity work, fear and anxiety, and concern for patients and family members. Second, self-coping styles included psychological and life adjustment, altruistic acts, team support, and rational cognition. Third, we found growth under pressure, which included increased affection and gratefulness, development of professional responsibility, and self-reflection. Finally, we showed that positive emotions occurred simultaneously with negative emotions. CONCLUSIONS: During an epidemic outbreak, positive and negative emotions of the front-line nurses interweaved and coexisted. In the early stage, negative emotions were dominant and positive emotions appeared gradually. Self-coping styles and psychological growth played an important role in maintaining mental health of nurses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.018

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. Aliakbari, 2015, Ethical and legal challenges associated with disaster nursing, Nurs Ethics, 22, 493, 10.1177/0969733014534877 · DOI
  2. O'Boyle, 2006, Nurses' beliefs about public health emergencies: fear of abandonment, Am J Infect Control, 34, 351, 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.01.012 · doi:10.1016/j.ajic.2006.01.012
  3. Chung, 2005, SARS: caring for patients in Hong Kong, J Clin Nurs, 14, 510, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01072.x · DOI
  4. Kim, 2018, Nurses' experiences of care for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus in South Korea, Am J Infect Control, 46, 781, 10.1016/j.ajic.2018.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Khalid, 2016, Healthcare worker semotions, perceived stressors and coping strategies during MERS-CoV outbreak, Clin Med Res, 1303, 1
  6. Liu, 2019, Sources and symptoms of stress among nurses in the first Chinese anti-Ebola medical team during the Sierra Leone aid mission: a qualitative study, Int J Nurs Sci, 6, 187
  7. Honey, 2013, New Zealand nurses perceptions of caringfor patients with influenza A (H1N1), Nurs Crit Care, 18, 63, 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00520.x · DOI
  8. Smith, 2017, The psychosocial challenges of caring for patients with Ebola virus disease, Health security, 15, 104, 10.1089/hs.2016.0068 · DOI
  9. Liu, 2009, Instructive messages from Chinese nurses'stories of caring for SARS patients, J Clin Nurs, 18, 2880, 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02857.x · DOI
  10. Kang, 2020, The mental health of medical workers in Wuhan, China dealing with the 2019 novel coronavirus, Lancet Psychiatry, 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30047-X · DOI · Paper page
  11. Kang, 2018, Working experiences of nurses during the Middle East respiratory syndrome outbreak, Int J Nurs Pract, 24, e12664, 10.1111/ijn.12664 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Lee, 2005, Facing SARS: psychological impacts on SARS team nurses and psychiatric services in a Taiwan general hospital, Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 27, 352, 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.04.007 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Mak, 2009, Social support and psychological adjustment to SARS: the mediating role of self-care self-efficacy, Psychol Health, 24, 161, 10.1080/08870440701447649 · DOI
  14. Shih, 2002, The impact of the 9–21 earthquake experiences of Taiwanese nurses as rescuers, Soc Sci Med, 55, 659, 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00194-0 · DOI
  15. Mishra, 2016, Knowledge, attitude and anxiety towards pandemic flu a potential bio weapon among health professionals in Indore City, Przegl Epidemiol, 70
  16. Aoyagi, 2015, Healthcare workers'willingness to work during an influenza pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Influenza Other Respir Viruses, 9, 120, 10.1111/irv.12310 · DOI
  17. Carbone, 2017, Effects of optimism on recovery and mental health after a tornado outbreak, Psychol Health, 32, 530, 10.1080/08870446.2017.1283039 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,287

Metadata

Authors
Sun, N., Wei, L., Shi, S., Jiao, D., Song, R., Ma, L., Wang, H., Wang, C., Wang, Z., You, Y., Liu, S., & Wang, H.
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
592-598
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3014582523
Cited by
1,287
References
7
FWCI
103.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.018
The paper
Sun, N., Wei, L., Shi, S., Jiao, D., Song, R., Ma, L., Wang, H., Wang, C., Wang, Z., You, Y., Liu, S., & Wang, H. (2020). A qualitative study on the psychological experience of caregivers of COVID-19 patients. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.03.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.