Cited by 66COVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactCOVID-19 impact on air quality

The effect of state-level stay-at-home orders on COVID-19 infection rates

Open access
Castillo, Renan C., Staguhn, Elena D., Weston-Farber, Elias·2020·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

State-level stay-at-home orders were monitored to determine their effect on the rate of confirmed COVID-19 diagnoses. Confirmed cases were tracked before and after state-level stay-at-home orders were put in place. Linear regression techniques were used to determine slopes for log case count data, and meta analyses were conducted to combine data across states. The results were remarkably consistent across states and support the usefulness of stay-at-home orders in reducing COVID-19 infection rates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2020.05.017

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The UK Government introduced a directive, 'Stay home, Stay Safe, Protect the NHS' which introduced social distancing, working from home, wearing face masks in public places and 'shielding' for vulnerable groups to reduce the spread of Covid-19.

    “The Government introduced a directive, ‘Stay home, Stay Safe, Protect the NHS’ which introduced social distancing, working from home, wearing face masks in public places and ‘shielding’ for vulnerable groups to reduce the spread of Covid-19 [2].”

    From Legacy lessons from the COVID-19 era to improve trial participation and retention: Views from trial participants, PPIE contributors and trial staff across the NIHR portfolio (2024) · cites this paper as [2]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Castillo, R. C., Staguhn, E. D., & Weston-Farber, E.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Castillo, Renan C.
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
48
Issue
8
Pages
958-960
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027239575
Cited by
66
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › COVID-19 Prevention and Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › COVID-19 impact on air quality
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, stay-at-home orders, non-pharmaceutical interventions, confirmed cases, infection rate, public health policy, pandemic response, state-level policy evaluation
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Humans, Pneumonia, Viral, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review