The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization
Open accessAbstract
Background This study assessed psychosocial predictors of U.S. adults’ willingness to get a future COVID-19 vaccine and whether these predictors differ under an emergency use authorization (EUA) release of the vaccine. Methods A survey of 788 U.S. adults was conducted to explore the relationships between demographics and psychosocial predictors of intent to get a future COVID-19 vaccine as well as willingness to get such a vaccine under EUA. Results Significant predictors of COVID-19 vaccine uptake intentions were education, having insurance, scoring high on subjective norms, a positive attitude toward the vaccine, as well as high perceived susceptibility to COVID-19, high perceived benefits of the vaccine, scoring low on barriers to the vaccine, and scoring high on self-efficacy. Predictors of willingness to take a COVID-19 vaccine under EUA were age, race/ethnicity, positive subjective norms, high perceived behavioral control, positive attitudes toward the vaccine, as well as high perceived susceptibility to COVID-19, high perceived benefits of the vaccine, low barriers to the vaccine, and scoring high on self-efficacy for getting the vaccine. Concerns about rushed vaccine development appear to reduce vaccine uptake intent, as well as willingness to get the vaccine under EUA. Conclusions COVID-19 vaccine-related messages should both address concerns about the vaccine and its development and reinforce benefits of the vaccine (both factors significant in both models). Vaccine efforts may need to go beyond just communications campaigns correcting misinformation about a COVID-19 vaccine to also focus on re-establishing public trust in government agencies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
The Health Belief Model and Preventive Health Behavior
Rosenstock, I. M. (1974) · Health Education Monographs · doi:10.1177/109019817400200405 · Cited by 3,643
The COVID-19 vaccine development landscape
Thanh Le, T., Andreadakis, Z., Kumar, A., Gómez Román, R., Tollefsen, S., Saville, M., & Mayhew, S. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/d41573-020-00073-5 · Cited by 1,954
African Americans’ views on research and the Tuskegee Syphilis study
Freimuth, V. S., Quinn, S. C., Thomas, S. B., Cole, G., Zook, E., & Duncan, T. (2001) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00178-7 · Cited by 646
Structural Racism, Social Risk Factors, and Covid-19 — A Dangerous Convergence for Black Americans
Egede, L. E., & Walker, R. J. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp2023616 · Cited by 553
A future vaccination campaign against COVID-19 at risk of vaccine hesitancy and politicisation
Peretti-Watel, P., Seror, V., Cortaredona, S., Launay, O., Raude, J., Verger, P., Fressard, L., Beck, F., Legleye, S., L'Haridon, O., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30426-6 · Cited by 514
Gerend, M. A., & Shepherd, J. E. (2012) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9366-5 · Cited by 455
Jamison, A. M., Quinn, S. C., & Freimuth, V. S. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.12.020 · Cited by 384
Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19)
Glass, C. A., Cash, J. C., & Mullen, J. (2020) · Family Practice Guidelines · doi:10.1891/9780826153425.0016b · Cited by 358
Willingness to vaccinate against COVID-19 in Australia
Dodd, R. H., Cvejic, E., Bonner, C., Pickles, K., McCaffery, K. J., Ayre, J., Batcup, C., Copp, T., Cornell, S., Dakin, T., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(20)30559-4 · Cited by 280
Cited by
Cascini, F., Pantovic, A., Al-Ajlouni, Y., Failla, G., & Ricciardi, W. (2021) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101113 · Cited by 396
Review of COVID-19 Variants and COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy: What the Clinician Should Know?
Vasireddy, D., Vanaparthy, R., Mohan, G., Malayala, S. V., & Atluri, P. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Medicine Research · doi:10.14740/jocmr4518 · Cited by 197
Metadata
- Authors
- Guidry, J. P. D., Laestadius, L. I., Vraga, E. K., Miller, C. A., Perrin, P. B., Burton, C. W., Ryan, M., Fuemmeler, B. F., & Carlyle, K. E.
- Venue
- American Journal of Infection Control
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-02
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 137-142
- ISSN
- 0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3102515983
- Cited by
- 478
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 52.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.018
- The paper
- Guidry, J. P. D., Laestadius, L. I., Vraga, E. K., Miller, C. A., Perrin, P. B., Burton, C. W., Ryan, M., Fuemmeler, B. F., & Carlyle, K. E. (2021). Willingness to get the COVID-19 vaccine with and without emergency use authorization. American Journal of Infection Control. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2020.11.018
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.