Cited by 18Surgical site infection preventionInfection Control in HealthcareAntimicrobial agents and applications

Best products for skin antisepsis

Open access
Boyce, John M.·2023·American Journal of Infection Control

Abstract

BACKGROUND Skin antiseptics are used for several purposes before surgical procedures, for bathing high-risk patients as a means of reducing central line-associated infections and other health care associated infections. METHODS A PubMed search was performed to update the evidence on skin antiseptic products and practices. RESULTS Current guidelines for prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) recommend preoperative baths or showers with a plain or antimicrobial soap prior to surgery, but do not make recommendations on the timing of baths, the total number of baths needed, or about the use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CGH)-impregnated cloths. Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that pre-operative surgical hand antisepsis using an antimicrobial soap or alcohol-based hand rub yields similar SSI rates. Other studies have reported that using an alcohol-based hand rub caused less skin irritation, was easier to use, and required shorter scrub times than using antimicrobial soap. Current SSI prevention guidelines recommend using an alcohol-containing antiseptic for surgical site infection. Commonly used products contain isopropanol combined with either CHG or with povidone-iodine. Surgical site preparation protocols for shoulder surgery in men may need to include coverage for anaerobes. Several studies suggest the need to monitor and improve surgical site preparation techniques. Daily bathing of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a CHG-containing soap reduces the incidence of central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs). Evidence for a similar effect in non-ICU patients is mixed. Despite widespread CHG bathing of ICU patients, numerous barriers to its effective implementation exist. Measuring CHG levels on the skin is useful for identifying gaps in coverage and suboptimal skin concentrations. Using alcohol-based products with at least 2% CHG for skin preparation prior to central line insertion reduces CLABSIs. CONCLUSIONS Progress has been made on skin antisepsis products and protocols, but improvements in technique are still needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.02.002

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Antiseptic skin cleaning processes have been used in the pre-admission and early preoperative periods before various surgical procedures with most available evidence reported for orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic surgeries.

    “Antiseptic skin cleaning processes have been used in the pre-admission and early preoperative periods before various surgical procedures with most available evidence reported for orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic surgeries.137”

    From Guidelines for antenatal and preoperative care in cesarean delivery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society recommendations (part 1)—2025 update (2026) · cites this paper as [137]

    The Preoperative Bathing discussion (page not available in our copy) describes bathing before admission or on the night before or day of surgery, and lists orthopedic, colorectal, hysterectomy, and Cesarean procedures. It does not establish that most available evidence concerns orthopedic, gastrointestinal, and gynecologic surgery rather than other procedures. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boyce, J. M.
Corresponding author
Boyce, John M.
Venue
American Journal of Infection Control
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-11
Volume
51
Issue
11
Pages
A58-A63
ISSN
0196-6553 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4387932855
Cited by
18
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Infection Control (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
skin antiseptics, surgical site infection prevention, chlorhexidine gluconate, povidone-iodine, alcohol-based hand rub, antimicrobial soap, preoperative bathing, central line-associated bloodstream infection
MeSH terms
Ethanol, Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Infective Agents, Local, Antisepsis, Chlorhexidine, Humans, Male, Povidone-Iodine, Preoperative Care, Skin, Soaps, Surgical Wound Infection, 2-Propanol

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review