Cited by 246Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment StudiesAging, Health, and DisabilityMedical Practices and Rehabilitation

The determinants of participation in activities of daily living in people with impaired vision

Lamoureux, Ecosse L, Hassell, Jennifer B, Keeffe, Jill E·2004·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To investigate the determinants of participation in daily activities in people with impaired vision using the Impact of Vision Impairment (IVI) instrument. Design Cross-sectional study. Methods We recruited 319 participants with no vision rehabilitation history, distance visual acuity (VA) Results The areas of greatest restriction of participation were associated with reading, outdoor mobility, participation in leisure activities, and shopping. In stepwise linear regression presenting VA, the PCS-12 and MCS-12 explained the variance in leisure and work (60 participants or 19%), consumer and social interaction (92 participants or 30%), household and personal care (76 participants or 24%), mobility (92 participants or 30%), emotional reaction to visual loss and (106 participants or 33%), and total IVI score (114 participants or 36%). Having age-related macular degeneration contributed marginally to the IVI domains and total score (P Conclusions Distance VA and physical and mental health explained more than a third of the variance of the total score, suggesting that an intervention aimed at improving quality of life may include strategies to improve not only vision-related rehabilitation but also mental and physical health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2003.08.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lamoureux, E. L., Hassell, J. B., & Keeffe, J. E.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Lamoureux, Ecosse L
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-02
Volume
137
Issue
2
Pages
265-270
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1971269603
Cited by
246
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
5.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
Keywords
visual impairment, activities of daily living, participation restrictions, visual acuity, physical health, mental health, age-related macular degeneration, quality of life, leisure, mobility (physical function), social support
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Patient Participation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vision Disorders, Visual Acuity, Sickness Impact Profile, Persons with Visual Disabilities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review