Cited by 42Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDigital Accessibility for DisabilitiesDisability Rights and Representation

I Didn't Know that You Knew I Knew: Collaborative Shopping Practices between People with Visual Impairment and People with Vision

Yuan, Chien Wen, Hanrahan, Benjamin V., Lee, Sooyeon, Rosson, Mary Beth, Carroll, John M.·2017·Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

It is important to support independent living for people with visual impairments (PVI). Part of this can be accomplished with individual assistive technologies. However, in this paper we emphasize the social and collaborative needs for PVI to fully integrate into society as equals. The study assesses how PVI collaborate with different types of sighted partners when shopping together. We chose to study grocery shopping because it is a critical and challenging task for PVI. We conducted field observations and in-depth interviews with five PVI and their sighted shopping partners, including spouses, caseworkers, and store-provided courtesy shoppers. We found several factors that modulated these collaborations with varying forms of common ground: 1) knowledge about how to assist PVI; 2) interpersonal knowledge resulting from common experience and interpersonal relationship history; and 3) knowledge of shopping as a practice. We discuss our findings with respect to the implications for designing collaborative interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1145/3134753

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BLV people may collaborate with different types of partners while shopping to aid in a complex process or for social enjoyment.

    “Reports indicate that BLV people may collaborate with different types of partners while shopping to aid in a complex process or for social enjoyment [104].”
  • A multi-modal system could address assistance by enabling employees to assist through a store-operated master tablet, providing an overview of ongoing transactions and facilitating necessary adjustments without direct device handling.

    “A multi-modal system could address this by enabling employees to assist through a store-operated master tablet, providing an overview of ongoing transactions and facilitating necessary adjustments without direct device handling [104].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, C. W., Hanrahan, B. V., Lee, S., Rosson, M. B., & Carroll, J. M.
Affiliations
  • Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Published
2017-12-06
Volume
1
Issue
CSCW
Pages
1-18
ISSN
2573-0142 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772917726
Cited by
42
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (1317560)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
visual impairment, independent living, assistive technology, grocery shopping, collaborative interaction, common ground, social integration, interpersonal relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review