Cited by 4Digital Accessibility for DisabilitiesAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityDisability Rights and Representation

Designing Equal Participation in Informal Learning for People with Visual Impairment

Open access
Yuan, Chien Wen, Hanrahan, Benjamin V., Lee, Sooyeon, Carroll, John M.·2015·Interaction Design and Architecture(s)

Abstract

Informal learning opportunities that complement formal education with diversity and flexibility are abundant in our daily lives. While sighted people take advantage of such learning and may take it for granted, people with visual impairment are sometimes excluded, due to their sight loss, from accessing informal learning, social interaction, and civic engagement. In this sense, they are not equal participants in the highly visual, sighted world. This paper investigates the needs of people with visual impairment, identifies issues, and suggests a direction to support equal participation. We propose four environment scenarios, grounded in our field work, to describe how to support learning and interaction in a sighted world. We discuss how design implications derived from our scenario-based analysis can help guide technological interventions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.55612/s-5002-027-006

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Shopping is not simply buying items on a list; for people without visual impairment, shopping also entails opportunistically exploring new products or brands, engaging in cultural learning about tastes, and making different choices based on occasional sales.

    “Shopping is not simply buying items on a list. For people without visual impairment, shopping also entails opportunistically exploring new products or brands, engaging in cultural learning about tastes, and making different choices based on occasional sales [89].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yuan, C. W., Hanrahan, B. V., Lee, S., & Carroll, J. M.
Venue
Interaction Design and Architecture(s)
Published
2015-12-20
Issue
27
Pages
93-106
ISSN
  • 1826-9745 (ISSN-L)
  • 2283-2998
OpenAlex
W2575257498
Cited by
4
References
27
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
4.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Interaction design & architecture(s)/ID&A Interaction design & architecture(s) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Rights and Representation
Keywords
visual impairment, informal learning, equal participation, accessibility, inclusive design, social interaction, citizen participation, assistive technology, scenario-based assessment, design implications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review