Cited by 26Retinal Imaging and AnalysisRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsOphthalmology and Visual Health Research

Screening for Diabetic Retinopathy by Ophthalmologists and Endocrinologists With Pupillary Dilation and a Nonmydriatic Digital Camera

Deb-Joardar, Nilanjana, Germain, Natacha, Thuret, Gilles, Manoli, Pierre, Garcin, Anne-Frederique, Millot, Luc, Gavet, Yann, Estour, Bruno +1 more·2005·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To assess the effects of pupillary dilation on image quality and certitude of screening diabetic retinopathy by trained endocrinologists using a digital nonmydriatic camera. Design Prospective, comparative, observational case series. Methods One hundred fifty patients with diabetes attending a hospital-based photographic screening clinic had five-field (45 degree) digital retinal imaging and mosaic construction, first through dark-adapted pupils, then after a single application of tropicamide 1%. The 600 sets of images (150 patients, 300 eyes, before and after dilation) were graded independently and in a blinded manner by two endocrinologists and two ophthalmologists, with the consensual opinion on dilated images of the latter serving as the gold standard. The criteria of evaluation were assessment of image quality and certitude of detecting and grading retinopathy. Results Of 300 eyes, pharmacological mydriasis improved image quality, with an increase in the number of eyes with five good images from seven to 160 and good-quality mosaics from 99 to 233. Dilation allowed better identification of maculopathy in the second eye because there was a decrease in ungradeable central images from 127 to 15 eyes. Dilation increased the number of eyes having retinopathy detected with certainty from 153 to 252 and graded with certainty from 173 to 277. No adverse effects were recorded. Conclusions Single application of tropicamide 1% significantly improves image quality and certit…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2005.05.051

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deb-Joardar, N., Germain, N., Thuret, G., Manoli, P., Garcin, A.-F., Millot, L., Gavet, Y., Estour, B., & Gain, P.
Affiliations
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Étienne (FR)
  • Mines Saint-Étienne (FR)
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-11
Volume
140
Issue
5
Pages
814-821.e2
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040580661
Cited by
26
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, retinal screening, pupil dilation, tropicamide, image quality, retinopathy grading
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Dark Adaptation, Diabetic Retinopathy, Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological, Endocrinology, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Male, Middle Aged, Mydriatics, Ophthalmology, Photography, Pilot Projects, Prospective Studies, Pupil, Tropicamide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review