Cited by 113Retinal Development and DisordersRetinal Diseases and TreatmentsGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Long-term follow-up of patients with retinitis pigmentosa receiving intraocular ciliary neurotrophic factor implants

Open access
Birch, David G., Bennett, Lea D., Duncan, Jacque L., Weleber, Richard G., Pennesi, Mark E.·2016·American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the long-term efficacy of ciliary neurotrophic factor delivered via an intraocular encapsulated cell implant for the treatment of retinitis pigmentosa.Design Long-term follow-up of a multicenter, sham-controlled study.Methods Thirty-six patients at 3 CNTF4 sites were randomly assigned to receive a high- or low-dose implant in 1 eye and sham surgery in the fellow eye. The primary endpoint (change in visual field sensitivity at 12 months) had been reported previously. Here we measure long-term visual acuity, visual field, and optical coherence tomography (OCT) outcomes in 24 patients either retaining or explanting the device at 24 months relative to sham-treated eyes.Results Eyes retaining the implant showed significantly greater visual field loss from baseline than either explanted eyes or sham eyes through 42 months. By 60 months and continuing through 96 months, visual field loss was comparable among sham-treated eyes, eyes retaining the implant, and explanted eyes, as was visual acuity and OCT macular volume.Conclusions Over the short term, ciliary neurotrophic factor released continuously from an intravitreal implant led to loss of total visual field sensitivity that was greater than the natural progression in the sham-treated eye. This additional loss of sensitivity related to the active implant was reversible when the implant was removed. Over the long term (60-96 months), there was no evidence of efficacy for visual acuity, visual field sensitivity, or OCT measures of retinal structure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.07.013

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neuroprotective factors such as GDNF, CNTF, BDNF, basic fibroblast growth factor, and PEDF have shown promise in mouse models of retinal degeneration.

    “Neuroprotective factors that support the survival of retinal cells, such as glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), basic fibroblast growth factor, and pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) have shown promise in mouse models of retinal degeneration.67,103–105”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Birch, D. G., Bennett, L. D., Duncan, J. L., Weleber, R. G., & Pennesi, M. E.
Affiliations
  • Retina Foundation of the Southwest (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
Corresponding author
Birch, David G.
Venue
American Journal of Ophthalmology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
170
Pages
10-14
ISSN
0002-9394 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2501579558
Cited by
112
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1
FWCI
6.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5k08ey021186-03)
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (R01 FD004100)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY009076, K08-EY021186)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
retinitis pigmentosa, ciliary neurotrophic factor, visual field sensitivity, visual acuity, macular volume, implant removal, long-term efficacy, neurotrophic therapy
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Electroretinography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Retina, Retinitis Pigmentosa, Visual Acuity, Visual Fields, Drug Delivery Systems, Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Visual Field Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review