Cited by 120Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementBirth, Development, and Health

Prepregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, and risk of hypertensive pregnancy among Latina women

Fortner, Renée Turzanski, Pekow, Penelope, Solomon, Caren G., Markenson, Glenn, Chasan-Taber, Lisa·2009·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective Prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) and gestational weight gain have been associated with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, but previous studies have included few Latinas, a group at increased risk. Study design We examined these associations in the Latina Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Study, a prospective cohort of 1231 women conducted from 2000 to 2004. Results In multivariable analysis, obese women (BMI > 29.0 kg/m(2)) had 2.5 times the risk of hypertensive pregnancy (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-4.8) and 2.7 times the risk of preeclampsia (95% CI, 1.2-5.8), compared with women whose BMI was 19.8 to 26.0 kg/m(2). Women with excessive gestational weight gain had a 3-fold increased risk of a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy (95% CI, 1.1-7.2) and a 4-fold risk of preeclampsia (95% CI, 1.2-14.5), compared with women achieving weight gain guidelines. Conclusion These findings suggest prepregnancy obesity and excessive weight gain are associated with hypertension in pregnancy in a Latina population and could be potentially modifiable risk factors.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2008.08.021

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Lower GWG in women with GDM is associated with reduced risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia, caesarean section, and macrosomia without increasing small-for-gestational-age risks.

    “Lower GWG in women with GDM [44,45,46,47,48,49] is associated with reduced risks of pregnancy-induced hypertension, pre-eclampsia [49,50,51], caesarean section [47], and macrosomia [43,49] without increasing small-for-gestational-age (SGA) risks [43,49].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fortner, R. T., Pekow, P., Solomon, C. G., Markenson, G., & Chasan-Taber, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Baystate Medical Center (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
200
Issue
2
Pages
167.e1-167.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055202417
Cited by
120
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 5
FWCI
9.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
pre-pregnancy body mass index, gestational weight gain, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, Hispanic women, maternal obesity, risk factors
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Obesity, Pregnancy, Puerto Rico, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review