Cited by 3Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsBirth, Development, and Health

366: Placental volume measurements early in pregnancy predict adverse perinatal outcomes

Schwartz, Nadav, Coletta, Jaclyn, Srinivas, Sindhu, Pessel, Cara, Timor, Ilan E., Parry, Sam, Salafia, Carolyn·2009·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.10.381

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schwartz, N., Coletta, J., Srinivas, S., Pessel, C., Timor, I. E., Parry, S., & Salafia, C.
Affiliations
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-12
Volume
201
Issue
6
Pages
S142-S143
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1994502215
Cited by
3
References
0
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
placental volume, early pregnancy, perinatal outcomes, adverse pregnancy outcomes, placental development, prenatal ultrasound

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review