Cited by 29Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsHernia repair and managementMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

Effect of surgical approach on physical activity and pain control after sacral colpopexy.

Collins, Sarah A., Tulikangas, Paul K., O'Sullivan, David M.·2012·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective We sought to compare recovery of activity and pain control after robotic (ROB) vs abdominal (ABD) sacral colpopexy.Study design Women undergoing ROB and ABD sacral colpopexy wore accelerometers for 7 days preoperatively and the first 10 days postoperatively. They completed postoperative pain diaries and Short Form-36 questionnaires before and after surgery.Results At 5 days postoperatively, none of the 14 subjects in the ABD group and 4 of 28 (14.3%) in the ROB group achieved 50% total baseline activity counts (P = .283). At 10 days, 5 of 14 (35.7%) in the ABD group and 8 of 26 (30.8%) in the ROB group (P = .972) achieved 50%. Postoperative pain was similar in both groups. Short Form-36 vitality scores were lower (P = .017) after surgery in the ABD group, but not in the ROB group.Conclusion Women undergoing ROB vs ABD sacral colpopexy do not recover physical activity faster, and pain control is not improved.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.01.036

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the study by Collins et al, all patients were provided restrictive instructions, and a minimum threshold of physical activity was not used as an inclusion criterion.

    “Notably, all patients in the study by Collins et al21 were provided restrictive instructions, and a minimum threshold of physical activity was not used as an inclusion criterion.”
  • We observed significantly faster rates of recovery time than were observed by Collins et al, where no participants undergoing abdominal or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy recovered 90% of baseline activity by 14 days after surgery.

    “We also observed significantly faster rates of recovery time than were observed by Collins et al,21 where no participants undergoing abdominal or minimally invasive sacrocolpopexy recovered 90% of baseline activity by 14 days after surgery.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Collins, S. A., Tulikangas, P. K., & O'Sullivan, D. M.
Affiliations
Hartford Hospital (US)
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-05
Volume
206
Issue
5
Pages
438.e1-438.e6
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1998505973
Cited by
29
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Minimally Invasive Surgical Techniques
Keywords
sacrocolpopexy, robotic surgery, abdominal surgery, postoperative pain, accelerometry, quality of life, pelvic organ prolapse, Short Form-36
MeSH terms
Aged, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Motor Activity, Narcotics, Pain Measurement, Postoperative Pain, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Robotics, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Vagina, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review