Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations

Open access
Stout, Molly J., Conlon, Bridget, Landeau, Michele, Lee, Iris, Bower, Carolyn, Zhao, Qiuhong, Roehl, Kimberly A., Nelson, D. Michael, Macones, George A., Mysorekar, Indira U.·2013·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Objective Bacteria have been identified in different regions of the placenta. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the maternal basal plate of the placenta harbors microbes which may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Study Design We performed a cross-sectional study of pregnancies from a single tertiary care hospital. Maternal medical and obstetric characteristics were obtained and pregnancies followed prospectively for outcomes and placental collection. After delivery, systematic random sampling of the placental basal plate was performed. Paraffin sections of basal plates were stained with four histological stains and scored for morphological evidence of bacteria. Results Of 195 total patients in the study, Gram positive and negative intracellular bacteria of diverse morphologies were documented in the basal plates of 27% of all placentas. 35% of the patients delivered preterm. No difference was noted between placental basal plates from preterm or term gestations. Intracellular bacteria were found in the placental basal plates of 54% spontaneous preterm deliveries before 28 weeks, and in 26% of term spontaneous deliveries (p=0.02). Intracellular bacteria were also documented in placentas without clinical or pathologic chorioamnionitis. Conclusions 27% of placentas demonstrated intracellular bacteria in the placental basal plate using morphological techniques. Thus, the maternal basal plate is a possible source of intrauterine colonization and placental pathological examination could include examination for bacteria in this important maternal fetal interface.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 390

Metadata

Authors
Stout, M. J., Conlon, B., Landeau, M., Lee, I., Bower, C., Zhao, Q., Roehl, K. A., Nelson, D. M., Macones, G. A., & Mysorekar, I. U.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
208
Issue
3
Pages
226.e1-226.e7
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2125984839
Cited by
390
References
2
FWCI
18.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018
The paper
Stout, M. J., Conlon, B., Landeau, M., Lee, I., Bower, C., Zhao, Q., Roehl, K. A., Nelson, D. M., Macones, G. A., & Mysorekar, I. U. (2013). Identification of intracellular bacteria in the basal plate of the human placenta in term and preterm gestations. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.