Cited by 26Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsGynecological conditions and treatmentsHernia repair and management

Consistently inconsistent, the posterior vaginal wall

Hale, Douglass S., Fenner, Dee·2016·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

Posterior vaginal wall prolapse is one of the most common prolapses encountered by gynecological surgeons. What appears to be a straightforward condition to diagnose and treat surgically for physicians has proven to be frustratingly unpredictable with regard to symptom relief for patients. Functional disorders such as dyssynergic defecation and constipation are often attributed to posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Little scientific evidence supports this assumption, emphasizing that structure and function are not synonymous when treating posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Rectoceles, enteroceles, sigmoidoceles, peritoneoceles, rectal and intraanal intussusception, rectal prolapse, and descending perineal syndrome are all conditions that have an impact on the posterior vaginal wall. All too often these different anatomic conditions are treated with the same surgical approach, addressing a posterior vaginal wall bulge with a traditional posterior colporrhaphy. Studies that examine the correlation between stage of posterior wall prolapse and patient symptoms have failed to reliably do so. Surgical outcomes measured by prolapse staging appear successful, yet patient expectations are often not met. As increasing attention is being placed on patient satisfaction outcomes concerning surgical treatments, this fact will need to be addressed. Surgeons will have to clearly communicate what can and what cannot be expected with surgical repair of posterior vaginal wall prolapse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.001

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The mismatch between expectations and goals may be influenced by inadequate counselling, poor 'customer' care, consideration of the impact of prolapse on body image, sexual function, and perhaps other indirect effects; those on a woman's anxiety, depression, and cognitive state.

    “This mismatch, and that between expectations and goals, may be influenced by inadequate counselling, poor ‘customer’ care, consideration of the impact of prolapse on body image, sexual function, and perhaps other indirect effects; those on a woman's anxiety, depression, and cognitive state [25, 26, 27, 28, 29].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hale, D. S., & Fenner, D.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Hale, Douglass S.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-03
Volume
214
Issue
3
Pages
314-320
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1539317765
Cited by
26
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
Keywords
posterior vaginal wall prolapse, pelvic organ prolapse, dyssynergic defecation, constipation, rectocele, enterocele, sigmoidocele, rectal intussusception, rectal prolapse, posterior colporrhaphy, prolapse staging, patient satisfaction, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Constipation, Female, Humans, Vagina, Vaginal Diseases, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review