Cited by 14Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive Health and ContraceptionWomen's cancer prevention and management

A prospective study of treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and fecundability

Open access
Wise, Lauren A., Willis, Sydney K., Perkins, Rebecca B., Wesselink, Amelia K., Klann, Alexandra, Crowe, Holly M., Hahn, Kristen A., Mikkelsen, Ellen M. +1 more·2020·American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia remove precancerous cells from the cervix by excising or ablating the transformation zone. Most studies show no association between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatments and fertility outcomes. However, only 2 studies have examined time to pregnancy, both using retrospective study designs, with 1 study showing no association and the other showing a 2-fold increased risk of infertility (time to pregnancy >12 months) following excisional or ablative treatment. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatments and fecundability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from Pregnancy Study Online (PRESTO), a prospective cohort study of North American pregnancy planners enrolled during 2013-2019. At baseline, women reported whether they ever had an abnormal Papanicolaou test result, the number of abnormal Papanicolaou test results, and their age at first abnormal Papanicolaou test result. They also reported whether they underwent diagnostic (colposcopy) or treatment (excisional or ablative) procedures, and their age at each procedure. We restricted analyses to 8017 women with 6 or fewer cycles of attempt time at enrollment who reported receiving a Papanicolaou test in the previous 3 years. We estimated fecundability ratios and 95% confidence intervals using proportional probabilities models adjusted for sociodemographics, healthcare use, smoking, number of sexual partners, history of sexually transmitted infections, and human papillomavirus vaccination. RESULTS: A history of abnormal Papanicolaou test results showed little association with fecundability (fecundability ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.95-1.06). Likewise, receipt of colposcopy or treatment procedures, and time since treatment were not materially associated with fecundability. Results were similar when stratified by age and smoking status. CONCLUSION: We observed no appreciable association of self-reported history of abnormal Papanicolaou test results, colposcopy, treatments for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, or recency of treatment with fecundability. These results agree with the majority of previous studies in indicating little effect of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treatments on future fertility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.12.017

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wise, L. A., Willis, S. K., Perkins, R. B., Wesselink, A. K., Klann, A., Crowe, H. M., Hahn, K. A., Mikkelsen, E. M., & Hatch, E. E.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
Corresponding author
Wise, Lauren A.
Venue
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-07
Volume
223
Issue
1
Pages
96.e1-96.e15
ISSN
0002-9378 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998673070
Cited by
14
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21-HD072326, R01-HD086742, R03-HD094117)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, fecundability, fertility, time to pregnancy, excisional treatment, ablative treatment, colposcopy, human papillomavirus, smoking
MeSH terms
Adult, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Fertility, Humans, Prospective Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review