Cited by 34

Improving astaxanthin production of Haematococcus pluvialis by an efficient fed-batch strategy in a photobioreactor

Yang, Shufang, Zhao, Weiyang, Mou, Haijin, Sun, Han·2021·Algal Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102539

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Yang et al. (2021) pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation with automated photobioreactor increased H. pluvialis biomass concentration by 90.6% under mixotrophic conditions.

    “Yang et al. (2021) [58] developed a pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation strategy, integrated with an automated photobioreactor system, to enhance H. pluvialis growth and astaxanthin production under mixotrophic conditions. By coupling nutrient delivery to real-time pH monitoring, the system increased biomass concentration by 90.6% and elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1, showcasing”
  • Yang et al. (2021) pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation with automated photobioreactor elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1 under mixotrophic conditions.

    “Yang et al. (2021) [58] developed a pH-responsive fed-batch cultivation strategy, integrated with an automated photobioreactor system, to enhance H. pluvialis growth and astaxanthin production under mixotrophic conditions. By coupling nutrient delivery to real-time pH monitoring, the system increased biomass concentration by 90.6% and elevated astaxanthin productivity to 4.5 mg L−1 d−1, showcasing”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S., Zhao, W., Mou, H., & Sun, H.
Venue
Algal Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-12
Volume
60
Pages
102539
ISSN
2211-9264
Cited by
34
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Qingdao Agricultural University (6651121007)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review