The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal Vitamin D Status for Colorectal Cancer Prevention
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies, such as the Women's Health Initiative, have shown that a low dose of vitamin D did not protect against colorectal cancer, yet a meta-analysis indicates that a higher dose may reduce its incidence. METHODS Five studies of serum 25(OH)D in association with colorectal cancer risk were identified using PubMed. The results of all five serum studies were combined using standard methods for pooled analysis. The pooled results were divided into quintiles with median 25(OH)D values of 6, 16, 22, 27, and 37 ng/mL. Odds ratios were calculated by quintile of the pooled data using Peto's Assumption-Free Method, with the lowest quintile of 25(OH)D as the reference group. A dose-response curve was plotted based on the odds for each quintile of the pooled data. Data were abstracted and analyzed in 2006. RESULTS Odds ratios for the combined serum 25(OH)D studies, from lowest to highest quintile, were 1.00, 0.82, 0.66, 0.59, and 0.46 (p(trend)<0.0001) for colorectal cancer. According to the DerSimonian-Laird test for homogeneity of pooled data, the studies were homogeneous (chi(2)=1.09, df=4, p=0.90. The pooled odds ratio for the highest quintile versus the lowest was 0.49 (p<0.0001, 95% confidence interval, 0.35-0.68). A 50% lower risk of colorectal cancer was associated with a serum 25(OH)D level > or =33 ng/mL, compared to < or =12 ng/mL. CONCLUSIONS The evidence to date suggests that daily intake of 1000-2000 IU/day of vitamin D(3) could reduce the incidence of colorectal with minimal risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions
Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471445428 · Cited by 18,646
Deeks, J. J., Altman, D. G., & Bradburn, M. J. (2001) · Systematic Reviews in Health Care · doi:10.1002/9780470693926.ch15 · Cited by 2,163
Vitamin D: a millenium perspective
Holick, M. F. (2003) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.10338 · Cited by 1,319
Self-citationFeskanich, D., Willett, W. C., & Colditz, G. A. (2003) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/77.2.504 · Cited by 358
Cited by
Vitamin D and Human Health: Lessons from Vitamin D Receptor Null Mice
Bouillon, R., Carmeliet, G., Verlinden, L., van Etten, E., Verstuyf, A., Luderer, H. F., Lieben, L., Mathieu, C., & Demay, M. (2008) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2008-0004 · Cited by 1,783
Sunlight and Vitamin D: A global perspective for health
Wacker, M., & Holick, M. F. (2013) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.24494 · Cited by 1,156
Self-citationDemographic Differences and Trends of Vitamin D Insufficiency in the US Population, 1988-2004
Ginde, A. A., Liu, M. C., & Camargo, C. A. (2009) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2008.604 · Cited by 1,120
Theodoratou, E., Tzoulaki, I., Zgaga, L., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2014) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.g2035 · Cited by 956
Vitamin D supplementation for prevention of mortality in adults
Bjelakovic, G., Gluud, L. L., Nikolova, D., Whitfield, K., Wetterslev, J., Simonetti, R. G., Bjelakovic, M., & Gluud, C. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007470.pub3 · Cited by 695
Metadata
- Authors
- Gorham, E. D., Garland, C. F., Garland, F. C., Grant, W. B., Mohr, S. B., Lipkin, M., Newmark, H. L., Giovannucci, E., Wei, M., & Holick, M. F.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2007-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 210-216
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007514658
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 41.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal Vitamin D Status for Colorectal Cancer Prevention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.004
- The paper
- Gorham, E. D., Garland, C. F., Garland, F. C., Grant, W. B., Mohr, S. B., Lipkin, M., Newmark, H. L., Giovannucci, E., Wei, M., & Holick, M. F. (2007). Optimal Vitamin D Status for Colorectal Cancer Prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.11.004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.