The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers
Abstract
CONTEXT Screening reduces mortality from breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers. The Guide to Community Preventive Services previously conducted systematic reviews on the effectiveness of 11 interventions to increase screening for these cancers. This article presents results of updated systematic reviews for nine of these interventions. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Five databases were searched for studies published during January 2004-October 2008. Studies had to (1) be a primary investigation of one or more intervention category; (2) be conducted in a country with a high-income economy; (3) provide information on at least one cancer screening outcome of interest; and (4) include screening use prior to intervention implementation or a concurrent group unexposed to the intervention category of interest. Forty-five studies were included in the reviews. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Recommendations were added for one-on-one education to increase screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and group education to increase mammography screening. Strength of evidence for client reminder interventions to increase FOBT screening was upgraded from sufficient to strong. Previous findings and recommendations for reducing out-of-pocket costs (breast cancer screening); provider assessment and feedback (breast, cervical, and FOBT screening); one-on-one education and client reminders (breast and cervical cancer screening); and reducing structural barriers (breast cancer and FOBT screening) were reaffirmed or unchanged. Evidence remains insufficient to determine effectiveness for the remaining screening tests and intervention categories. CONCLUSIONS Findings indicate new and reaffirmed interventions effective in promoting recommended cancer screening, including colorectal cancer screening. Findings can be used in community and healthcare settings to promote recommended care. Important research gaps also are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
National Center for Health Statistics ( NCHS )
Feinleib, M. (2005) · Encyclopedia of Biostatistics · doi:10.1002/0470011815.b2a16042 · Cited by 1,574
Task Force on Community Preventive Services
(2005) · The Guide to Community Preventive Services · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195151091.002.0004 · Cited by 1,159
Association of Insurance with Cancer Care Utilization and Outcomes
Ward, E., Halpern, M., Schrag, N., Cokkinides, V., DeSantis, C., Bandi, P., Siegel, R., Stewart, A., & Jemal, A. (2008) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/ca.2007.0011 · Cited by 724
Xu, J., Kochanek, K. D., Murphy, S. L., & Tejada‐Vera, B. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 650
Early Experience With Pay-for-Performance: From Concept to Practice
Rosenthal, M. B., Frank, R. G., Li, Z., & Epstein, A. M. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.294.14.1788 · Cited by 623
Briss (2000) · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(99)00119-1 · Cited by 565
Tierney, W. M., Hui, S. L., & McDonald, C. J. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198608000-00001 · Cited by 337
Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening
Everett, T., Bryant, A., Griffin, M. F., Martin-Hirsch, P. P., Forbes, C. A., & Jepson, R. G. (2011) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002834.pub2 · Cited by 332
Baron, R. C., Rimer, B. K., Breslow, R. A., Coates, R. J., Kerner, J., Melillo, S., Habarta, N., Kalra, G. P., Chattopadhyay, S., Wilson, K. M., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.002 · Cited by 277
Self-citationSystematic Review: Enhancing the Use and Quality of Colorectal Cancer Screening
Holden, D. J., Jonas, D. E., Porterfield, D. S., Reuland, D., & Harris, R. (2010) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Wolf, A. M. D., Fontham, E. T. H., Church, T. R., Flowers, C. R., Guerra, C. E., LaMonte, S. J., Etzioni, R., McKenna, M. T., Oeffinger, K. C., Shih, Y. T., et al. (2018) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21457 · Cited by 1,944
Dougherty, M. K., Brenner, A. T., Crockett, S. D., Gupta, S., Wheeler, S. B., Coker-Schwimmer, M., Cubillos, L., Malo, T., & Reuland, D. S. (2018) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4637 · Cited by 362
Arrossi, S., Thouyaret, L., Herrero, R., Campanera, A., Magdaleno, A., Cuberli, M., Barletta, P., Laudi, R., & Orellana, L. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(14)70354-7 · Cited by 217
Farvardin, S., Patel, J., Khambaty, M., Yerokun, O. A., Mok, H., Tiro, J. A., Yopp, A. C., Parikh, N. D., Marrero, J. A., & Singal, A. G. (2017) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.28770 · Cited by 185
Maar, M., Burchell, A., Little, J., Ogilvie, G., Severini, A., Yang, J. M., & Zehbe, I. (2013) · Women's Health Issues · doi:10.1016/j.whi.2013.06.005 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Sabatino, S. A., Lawrence, B., Elder, R., Mercer, S. L., Wilson, K. M., DeVinney, B., Melillo, S., Carvalho, M., Taplin, S., Bastani, R., Rimer, B. K., Vernon, S. W., Melvin, C. L., Taylor, V., Fernandez, M., & Glanz, K.
- Venue
- American Journal of Preventive Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-118
- ISSN
- 0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2159622200
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 113
- FWCI
- 16.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009
- The paper
- Sabatino, S. A., Lawrence, B., Elder, R., Mercer, S. L., Wilson, K. M., DeVinney, B., Melillo, S., Carvalho, M., Taplin, S., Bastani, R., Rimer, B. K., Vernon, S. W., Melvin, C. L., Taylor, V., Fernandez, M., & Glanz, K. (2012). Effectiveness of Interventions to Increase Screening for Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancers. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.009
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
