Cited by 7Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Adolescent HealthMental Health Treatment and Access

Realizing Population-Level Improvements for All Children’s Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Health

Open access
Brown, C. Hendricks, Beardslee, William·2016·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

The strategy of using prevention as a first line of behavioral health care, particularly for children, is well accepted on scientific, economic, and social justice grounds. It just has not been made as a cornerstone of health in the U.S. Currently, the systems to promote children’s mental health and well-being; prevent substance abuse; and provide enabling, stimulating, and nurturing environments are not functioning in ways that our children and families need. This is evidenced by high rates of depression, youth homicide and suicide, and substance misuse, as well as the existence of major health disparities.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.07.017

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If we can legitimately borrow strength from previous studies and a modest amount of empirical evidence, this could accelerate and expand benefit to populations that have experienced health disparities that might never be included in a rigorous randomized effectiveness trial.

    “Indeed, if we can legitimately borrow strength from previous studies and a modest amount of empirical evidence, this could accelerate and expand benefit to populations that have experienced health disparities that might never be included in a rigorous randomized effectiveness trial [6].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [25]Cruden G, Kelleher K, Kellam S, Brown CH. Integrating Public Health and Education to Improve Population Health Across the Life Course. Am J Prev Med. 2016; In press. PMC5505174 27542653

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, C. H., & Beardslee, W.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, C. Hendricks
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
S101-S105
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2518895179
Cited by
7
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30DA027828, DA027828)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
child mental health, prevention, substance use prevention, youth suicide, juvenile homicide, depression, health disparities, child well-being, family support, behavioral health services
MeSH terms
Child Health, Child, Cognition, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review