Cited by 581Health Policy Implementation ScienceEvaluation and Performance AssessmentSchool Health and Nursing Education

The Adaptome

Open access
Chambers, David A., Norton, Wynne E.·2016·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

In the past few decades, prevention scientists have developed and tested a range of interventions with demonstrated benefits on child and adolescent cognitive, affective, and behavioral health. These evidence-based interventions offer promise of population-level benefit if accompanied by findings of implementation science to facilitate adoption, widespread implementation, and sustainment. Though there have been notable examples of successful efforts to scale up interventions, more work is needed to optimize benefit. Although the traditional pathway from intervention development and testing to implementation has served the research community well-allowing for a systematic advance of evidence-based interventions that appear ready for implementation-progress has been limited by maintaining the hypothesis that evidence generation must be complete prior to implementation. This sets up the challenging dichotomy between fidelity and adaptation and limits the science of adaptation to findings from randomized trials of adapted interventions. The field can do better. This paper argues for the development of strategies to advance the science of adaptation in the context of implementation that would more comprehensively describe the needed fit between interventions and their settings, and embrace opportunities for ongoing learning about optimal intervention delivery over time. Efforts to build the resulting adaptome (pronounced "adapt-ohm") will include the construction of a common data platform to house systematically captured information about variations in delivery of evidence-based interventions across multiple populations and contexts, and provide feedback to intervention developers, as well as the implementation research and practice communities. Finally, the article identifies next steps to jumpstart adaptome data platform development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.05.011

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Mihalic S Irwin K Elliott D Fagan A Hansen D Blueprints for violence prevention. In for the Study and Prevention of Violence, University of Colorado National Scientific Council on the Developing Child. Citeseer 2004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/e302992005-001 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chambers, D. A., & Norton, W. E.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • National Cancer Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Chambers, David A.
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-10
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
S124-S131
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2461374963
Cited by
581
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 77 · 2023: 65 · 2022: 93 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 3
FWCI
71.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (Z99 CA999999)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
implementation science, evidence-based interventions, child and adolescent mental health, prevention interventions, scaling up interventions
MeSH terms
Child Health, Adolescent Health, Adolescent, Child, Humans, Mental Health, Preventive Health Services, Evidence-Based Medicine, Behavioral Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review