Cited by 103HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsHIV, Drug Use, Sexual RiskAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Biomedical and behavioral outcomes of Keep It Up!: an ehealth HIV prevention program RCT.

Open access
Mustanski, Brian, Parsons, Jeffrey T., Sullivan, Patrick S., Madkins, Krystal, Rosenberg, Eli, Swann, Gregory·2018·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Introduction HIV diagnoses among young men who have sex with men are increasing, but few effective HIV prevention interventions exist for this population. An RCT was conducted of the online Keep It Up! intervention to determine if it significantly reduced condomless anal sex and sexually transmitted infections compared with an HIV knowledge condition.Study design From May 2013 to March 2017, a total of 901 participants were enrolled in a double-blinded RCT of Keep It Up! with 1-year follow-up. After completing baseline surveys and sexually transmitted infection testing, participants were randomized by an eHealth platform to the intervention or control condition.Setting/participants HIV-negative men who have sex with men reporting condomless anal sex, aged 18-29 years, were recruited through advertising and from HIV testing sites and outreach in Atlanta, Georgia; Chicago, Illinois; and New York, New York.Intervention Multimedia was used to address HIV knowledge and motivate safer behaviors. The control condition reflected existing online HIV information.Main outcome measures Primary outcomes were incident gonorrhea or chlamydia at 12-month follow-up and self-reported condomless anal sex with casual partners at 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up.Results In 2017, data were analyzed from 445 (49%) participants randomized to the intervention and 456 (51%) to the control. Participants were primarily racial/ethnic minorities (63%). Sexually transmitted infections at Month 12 was 40% lower for intervention participants (risk ratio=0.60, 95% CI=0.38, 0.95, p=0.01). For the primary behavioral outcome, both arms showed reductions over time with 44% of control and 37% of intervention participants reporting condomless anal sex at Month 12 (prevalence ratio=0.83, 95% CI=0.70, 0.99, p=0.04).Conclusions The Keep It Up! intervention resulted in significantly lower sexually transmitted infection incidence and a small but significant decrease in condomless anal sex 12 months post-intervention relative to an online HIV knowledge condition. In addition, this study demonstrated the feasibility and acceptability of at-home sexually transmitted infection testing as part of an eHealth intervention.Trial registration This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov NCT01836445.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.026

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Brief, online, electronic-learning modules for young MSM have been reported to be effective in reducing incident STIs.

    “Brief, online, electronic-learning modules for young MSM have been reported to be effective in reducing incident STIs and offer a convenient client platform for effective interventions (10).”

    From Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021 (2021) · cites this paper as [10]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mustanski, B., Parsons, J. T., Sullivan, P. S., Madkins, K., Rosenberg, E., & Swann, G.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • City University of New York (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Corresponding author
Mustanski, Brian
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
151-158
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2811047402
Cited by
103
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 2
FWCI
9.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Gilead Sciences
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01DA035145)
  • National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
HIV prevention, young men who have sex with men, digital health interventions, condomless anal sex, sexually transmitted infections, gonorrhea, chlamydia, HIV/AIDS knowledge, HIV-negative men, online health interventions, sexual risk behavior, racial and ethnic minorities, intervention feasibility and acceptability, HIV prevention messaging
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, United States, HIV Infections, Telemedicine, Homosexuality, Male, Risk Reduction Behavior, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review