Cited by 2,075Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Bias in analytic research

Sackett, David L.·1979·Journal of Chronic Diseases

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0021-9681(79)90012-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sackett, D. L.
Corresponding author
Sackett, David L.
Venue
Journal of Chronic Diseases
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1979-01
Volume
32
Issue
1-2
Pages
51-63
ISSN
0021-9681 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2075917870
Cited by
2,075
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 52 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 79
FWCI
26.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Chronic Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
case-control study, cohort studies, rare diseases, research trends over time
MeSH terms
Epidemiologic Methods, Terminology as Topic, Research Design, Retrospective Studies, Sampling Studies, Statistics as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review