Cited by 11Cardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Risk Stratification for Recurrent Heart Failure in Patients Post-Myocardial Infarction With Electrocardiographic and Echocardiographic Left Atrial Abnormality

Ariyarajah, Vignendra, Malinski, Maciej, Zieroth, Shelley, Harizi, Robert, Morris, Andrew, Spodick, David H.·2008·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Left atrial enlargement is predictive of cardiovascular events. The predictive power, however, of the combination of electrocardiographic (LAE-ECG) and echocardiographic left atrial enlargement (LAE-Echo) has not been extensively evaluated. We prospectively identified patients admitted with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) who developed new-onset heart failure during admission. Baseline electrocardiograms obtained < or =12 months before admission were evaluated for LAE-ECG, such as prolonged P-wave duration or positive P-wave terminal force in lead V1, and in-hospital echocardiographic reports obtained < or =1 month after admission were assessed for linear, anteroposterior LAE-Echo. Follow-up was directed toward pertinent cardiovascular events and death. Of the 462 patients with NSTEMI, 108 developed new-onset heart failure (23%); 71 patients had LAE-Echo. Follow-up was 23.2 months (mean 22.1 months). Although in-hospital (early) cardiovascular complications (other than heart failure) were not significantly higher in patients with LAE-Echo, these patients demonstrated more postdischarge (late) cardiovascular complications, predominantly recurrent heart failure. In addition, those with a combination of LAE-Echo and LAE-ECG demonstrated significantly higher recurrence of heart failure (hazard ratio 1.52, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 4.35; p = 0.02 for interatrial conduction delay, and hazard ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 3.27 for P-wave terminal force in lead V1; p = 0.03) and increased mortality compared with those with LAE-Echo alone. In conclusion, our data suggest that a combination of electrical and mechanical left atrial dysfunction is significantly more predictive of increased cardiovascular events and mortality compared with left atrial mechanical dysfunction alone.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.01.013

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ECG signs of left atrial abnormality (a prolonged P-wave duration or positive P-wave terminal force in lead V1), if coupled with echocardiographic left atrial abnormalities, increase the predictive value for recurrence of heart failure and mortality compared to the predictive value of echocardiographic left atrial abnormalities alone.

    “ECG signs of left atrial abnormality, i.e., a prolonged P-wave duration or positive P-wave terminal force in lead V 1 , if coupled with echocardiographic left atrial abnormalities, increased the predictive value for recurrence of heart failure and mortality, compared to the predictive value of this last test alone.50”

    From The Year of 2008 in Electrocardiology (2010) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ariyarajah, V., Malinski, M., Zieroth, S., Harizi, R., Morris, A., & Spodick, D. H.
Affiliations
  • St. Boniface Hospital (CA)
  • Sherman Hospital (US)
  • Saint Vincent Hospital (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
101
Issue
10
Pages
1373-1378
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990713889
Cited by
11
References
23
Citations by year
2019: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
left atrial enlargement, heart failure recurrence, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, risk stratification, P-wave duration, P-wave terminal force, interatrial conduction delay, left atrial dysfunction, cardiovascular events, mortality, electrocardiogram, echocardiography
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiomyopathy, Dilated, Echocardiography, Electrocardiography, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Atria, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Myocardial Infarction, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Prevalence, Atrial Function, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review