Cited by 46Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchInflammatory Biomarkers in Disease PrognosisMechanical Circulatory Support Devices

Prognostic Value of Admission Myeloperoxidase Levels in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock

Dominguez-Rodriguez, Alberto, Samimi-Fard, Sima, Abreu-Gonzalez, Pedro, Garcia-Gonzalez, Martin J., Kaski, Juan Carlos·2008·The American Journal of Cardiology

Abstract

Inflammation plays a critical role in acute myocardial infarction. One inflammatory marker is myeloperoxidase (MPO). Its role as a predictor of in-hospital death in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS) is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the role of MPO as a predictor of in-hospital death in patients with STEMIs presenting with CS and treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In 38 consecutive patients with CS complicating STEMIs who were treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention, serum MPO levels were measured at coronary care unit admission using a commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The primary study end point was in-hospital cardiac death. Among the 38 patients included in the study, 20 died during their coronary care unit stays, whereas 18 survived. Compared with patients who survived, patients who died showed, at coronary care unit admission, higher serum MPO levels (81 +/- 28 vs 56 +/- 23 ng/ml, p <0.006). After controlling for different baseline clinical, laboratory, and angiographic variables, baseline serum MPO level was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 1.8 to 7.5, p <0.001). In conclusion, admission MPO concentration is an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with STEMIs presenting with CS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.02.032

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dominguez-Rodriguez, A., Samimi-Fard, S., Abreu-Gonzalez, P., Garcia-Gonzalez, M. J., & Kaski, J. C.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Venue
The American Journal of Cardiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
101
Issue
11
Pages
1537-1540
ISSN
0002-9149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170379045
Cited by
46
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Cardiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Keywords
myeloperoxidase, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, in-hospital mortality, prognostic factors, inflammation, primary percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary care unit admission
MeSH terms
Aged, Coronary Care Units, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Electrocardiography, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Male, Peroxidase, Myocardial Infarction, Prognosis, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Shock, Cardiogenic, Biomarkers, Confidence Intervals, Odds Ratio, Hospital Mortality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review